[Qgis-psc] Grants 2020 preparation for voting

[Andreas Neumann]

+1
I would also be in favor of accepting projects that fit into the budget
until all the funds are exhausted.

On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 08:41, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:

> Hi Nyall,
> Yes, that sounds reasonable to me.
> Regards,
> Anita
>
> 6 Jul 2020 01:54:21 Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi Anita,
> >
> > If I recall correctly, when we've hit the situation in the past that
> > there was a lower-voted project that fit within the remaining budget
> > then we've previously "skipped" over the higher budget, higher voted
> > proposal to also fund the lower budget proposals lower in the list
> > until all the reserved funds are exhausted. Is this also going to
> > happen this time? Basically it would affect whether or not part of the
> > remaining 5.6k budget would be allocated to the 3k "QEP#177 MacOS
> > Package Improvements" proposal.
> >
> > Nyall
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 00:57, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:
> >>
> >> The voting period is now over. I've closed the form and counted the
> votes. You find the preliminary results at:
> >>
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10MAeENptW-gi8spkmR_jn0Y-_9iYakR7wtV5XdSZZ1o/edit?usp=sharing
> >>
> >> As it stands now, the 8 top-ranked proposals can be funded within the
> 40k grant budget.
> >>
> >> Could I ask you to please cross-check the results before we announce
> them.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Anita
> >>
> >> Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Juni 2020 um 16:18 Uhr
> >> Von: "Anita Graser" <anitagraser at gmx.at>
> >>
> >> The call for voting has been sent out now. The deadline is on Sunday,
> July 5th 2020.
> >>
> >> Please get in touch if you are a voting member and haven't received the
> invitation.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Anita
> >>
> >> On 19.06.2020 18:01, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot Denis and  Anita for the great work!
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Marco
> >>
> >> On 19.06.20 16:34, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I agree - thanks a lot for your work, Denis!
> >>
> >> It helps to get a good summary and present it a bit better.
> >>
> >> Andreas
> >>
> >> On 2020-06-19 16:24, Anita Graser wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you Denis!
> >>
> >> I think this is an excellent overview of the proposals.
> >>
> >> My goal is to send the call for voting out tomorrow evening if there
> are no arguments against it.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Anita
> >>
> >> On 19.06.2020 13:48, Denis Rouzaud wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Anita,
> >>
> >> Here is a first draft of a one page summary of the grants to be voted
> on.
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aiolvIpEGhBZ-iLhZl7cbUP1gPQx1-W83ecijpzNi4o/edit?usp=sharing
> >>
> >> It's quite tricky to report the discussion without looking too
> negative. I hope this is neutral enough. I am totally open to suggestions,
> obviously.
> >>
> >> Let me know what you think,
> >> Denis
> >>
> >> Le lun. 15 juin 2020 à 19:50, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> a
> écrit :
> >>
> >> Thank you Denis!
> >>
> >> We need the summaries as soon as possible. According to our timeline,
> we wanted to publish the voting results at the end of June (after a two
> week voting period):
> >>
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CNmSJxztrHrqLfillDH8v1zWaMzxFUyYSPT3sut55eQ/edit?usp=sharing
> >>
> >> If you can manage to write the summaries by Sunday 21st, we can start
> the voting and have the results ready around July 6th.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Anita
> >>
> >> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 19:14 Denis Rouzaud, <denis.rouzaud at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I can give a hand for this. I can compile the summaries and comments.
> >> When is it due?
> >>
> >> Denis
> >>
> >> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, 19:04 Anita Graser, <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Do we have any volunteer for compiling the proposal and discussion
> >> summaries?
> >>
> >> If nobody is available to take care of this step - we have to decide if
> >> we feel comfortable to go ahead with the voting without the summaries.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Anita
> >>
> >> On 13.06.2020 21:06, Anita Graser wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Since the QEP discussion period is over now, we need to take the next
> >>> steps:
> >>>
> >>> According to our new process (discussed in
> >>> https://github.com/qgis/PSC/issues/31), proposal and discussion
> >>> summaries should be prepared that can be sent out to voters.
> >>>
> >>> @Paolo are you still available to take care of this?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Anita
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Qgis-psc mailing list
> >>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Qgis-psc mailing list
> >> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Qgis-psc mailing list
> >> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Qgis-psc mailing list
> >> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >>
> >> --
> >> Marco Bernasocchi
> >>
> >> QGIS.org Chair
> >> http://berna.io
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Qgis-psc mailing list
> >> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc



-- 

--
Andreas Neumann
QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200706/b5fe8d69/attachment-0001.html>