[RouterGeocoder] OpenRouter infrastructure

[Daniel Kastl]

Hi Steve,

Probably the best platform is the one, which most of us are familiar
with and which doesn't make to much trouble to migrate someday maybe to
the OSGeo servers.

>From that point of view we can't do much wrong with SVN+Trac. With a
little styling we can use it as website and wiki, too. I think for your
use cases we could even "abuse" the OSGeo wiki for now if you're in a
hurry ;-)

Probably Source Forge is a good start. Other options might be Launchpad
or Github, but that wouldn't be SVN then. I'm fine with any of them and
personally like Bazaar more than SVN.

I don't think the mailing list here has too much traffic (yet) and we
can keep it as it is.

If you like I can setup the platform as well. Well, let's listen if
there are other opinions or ideas out there.

Daniel



Stephen Woodbridge schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> Thought on setting up infrastructure for OpenRouter. I think we need:
>
> Mailing list is in place, if needed we could probably split the router
> and geocoder into two separate lists if the traffic get too much.
>
> SVN
>
> Trac
>
> Website
>
> Wiki
>
> I can figure out how to setup a project at source forge?
> Any other thoughts on this?
>
> Part of whats driving this is I have started to build a set of use
> cases that I thought we should post somewhere. Also we will hopefully
> be starting some GSoC activity and it would be nice to have some place
> to collect that.
>
> -Steve
> _______________________________________________
> Routergeocoder mailing list
> Routergeocoder at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/routergeocoder
>