[OSGeo Africa] FOSS vs ESRI and other GIS issues

Wed Jun 5 06:02:23 PDT 2013

You answered your own question:
The role of PLATO. "...in the FOSS environment it to have some certification
for service providers".

PLATO registration attempts to ensure/prove to clients that the
professionals they appoint/employ will have a broad skill set and give a
certain level of service/expertise. If not, they can complain to Plato who
can then take steps against the professional.

Would be great if most registered professionals came from the FOSS
community.

Cheers
W

-----Original Message-----
From: africa-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:africa-bounces at lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of Gerhard Brits
Sent: 05 June 2013 02:31 PM
To: africa at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [OSGeo Africa] FOSS vs ESRI and other GIS issues

Hi All

I have been following this discussion trough out the morning. 

What does it matter if you have a degree or a semester course in GIS. We
have engineers that operate GIS applications. It is how you use GIS and the
environment that you implement it that determines what educational
background you need. In my short career in GIS have seen very few people
that are competent that have some GIS degree or remote sensing background
and register with PLATO, but they have no clue what it means to convert file
types or to write a simple SQL query. So I do not understand even the role
of PLATO. Does n programmer need to be registered with PLATO? Maybe it is
just me being bias.

Government is a special place and very few GIS practitioners have the
ability to influence how the IM/IT landscape is planned. The problem that we
have in this world. The people that need to use systems do not have the
ability to find solutions to problems themselves. So most government
departments have put in large amount of money into developing staff to use a
software. To change to open source platform causes a large amount of money
to be spent to retrain people.

I think something we need to employ in the FOSS environment it to have some
certification for service providers. So that government/business know that
who they employee will deliver a professional and reliable service. Secondly
IT/IM decision makers should be educated in what is available in the open
source stack and how it can be used and the ease of use. GIS users should
not be retrained but just moved to new platforms. 

The way that the open source community is approaching business and
government is wrong I believe. Do not force something and do not sell
yourself on the basis that the software is free or very cheap. Sell yourself
by showing how good it is, how scalable, and how simple it is to use. What
type of support is available and how that support will be given to the
client. 

Regards

-----Original Message-----
From: africa-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:africa-bounces at lists.osgeo.org]
On Behalf Of africa-request at lists.osgeo.org
Sent: 05 June 2013 01:20 PM
To: africa at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Africa Digest, Vol 77, Issue 9

Send Africa mailing list submissions to
	africa at lists.osgeo.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	africa-request at lists.osgeo.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	africa-owner at lists.osgeo.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Africa digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. FW:   FOSS vs ESRI and other GIS issues (Walter Smit)
   2. Re: FW:   FOSS vs ESRI and other GIS issues (Llewellyn Gush)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 12:19:27 +0200
From: "Walter Smit" <walter.s at sa-solutions.co.za>
To: "Africa local chapter discussions" <africa at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: [OSGeo Africa] FW:   FOSS vs ESRI and other GIS issues
Message-ID: <004e01ce61d6$2bce9ea0$836bdbe0$@sa-solutions.co.za>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Ray

I have been physically deployed in a national government department (DRDLR)
for the past 18months and many of your points are very true. I could write a
whole essay about it, but here are some quick points.

*        Training and inexperienced staff ? I have had to teach graduated
GIS people (from various universities) what the difference is between files
and folders. Seems to me that many universities are missing the plot
completely on how to make young people ready for actual work.

*        ?not programmers? ? true, but the FOSS software I have used does
not require any more programming than over-the-counter suites.

*        Enough PGPs? Correct, there are very few. It is however a fallacy
that you need to be mentored by a PGP to be able to register with Plato (I
was not ? and I didn?t get the benefit of the Grandfather clause either). I
don?t know who started this lie, but it seems to stop people from even
trying to register.

*        I cannot comment on unscrupulous service providers ? solutions
should be scalable.

*        Freestate in the limelight ? I actually asked someone with more
knowledge than the reporters. He was of the opinion that the service
provider under quoted, because the range and scope of related services to
that website was enormous. Like following several officials around to all
their meetings for a year. 

*        Why pay more than once? Petty politics and leaders protecting their
own little empires. And corruption of course. We have tried doing this for
18months?no luck yet. Also the communication between provinces and levels of
government is ludicrously poor. Do you know what your direct neighbours in
Environmental Affairs are using? Hopefully Enrico and Nacelle will be
uploading their Bioregional Plans to the sharing platform when they are
done. The same platform where you can see the EIAs from NEIMS?*shameless
plug*

*        Data with known custodians. Have been doing this for 12months?it is
very very difficult. Reasons: lack of high level regard for (spatial) data,
capacity and attitudes of ?it isn?t in my job description?. Hopefully more
OSD posts will change this. Remember that very few departments have ever
taken responsibility for spatial data ? ever. It is a massively foreign
concept to them. We are making good progress on this in 2 provinces. In the
Northern Cape we have actually got all the HODs to sign MOUs that they will
be custodians for their datasets. Appointing the actual person/post to an
actual dataset is more of a challenge. 

*        GIS people in government. Lack of funding usually, or no GIS posts
on their organograms. Government salaries for GIS people are actually much
higher than private sector.

*        IT support in government. Cannot comment on something that doesn?t
exist :)

Personally I believe that departments would be better served by implementing
FOSS and spending the saved money on training. Because training (regardless
of software used) is what people really need. But then again?Tswane?why
change a system if it is already working for them? And their staff have
probably already had some decent training.

Rant over,

Regards

Walter Smit

Professional GISc Practitioner SA (PGP 1193)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/africa/attachments/20130605/21f1e088/attac
hment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:19:35 +0200
From: Llewellyn Gush <llewellyn at jgdm.gov.za>
To: Africa local chapter discussions <africa at lists.osgeo.org>, 	Walter
	Smit <walter.s at sa-solutions.co.za>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo Africa] FW:   FOSS vs ESRI and other GIS issues
Message-ID: <51AF1EC7.9080809 at jgdm.gov.za>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hello Walt

Just read your RANT on OsGeo

Seems you may be changing your allegiance - to ESRI and all that ;-)

On a serious note the debate around the use of OSS has been doing the rounds
in Gov now for longer than I care to remember. Nothing yet seems to have
come of it, the reasons may be many and the will seems to be non existent,
but one of the major stumbling blocks has been identified by yourself and
the previous writer. This is not just about GIS though that is the primary
focus of this forum. The whole debate is much broader and I think needs to
have the profile raised.

It is really sad when a person considers themselves "computer literate"
when they can use Word & Excel and then not even do Styles or formula's more
complex than simple addition - they use them as a glorified typewriter. It
is a fact that our educational institutions are doing a very poor job of
skilling students to really be computer literate. This has come about mostly
due to the penetration and exclusive use of a proprietary vendors solution,
which was given to educational institutions for free (Catch them young and
they are yours forever principle). I fail to understand why it is accepted
that a single vendors solutions should be considered as the only
contribution to a school/university curriculum. The education authorities
carry equal blame in this regard

Your "low blow" about IT support in Gov :-(

I like to think that at the institution where I am employed there is a least
a semblance of support. Suppose there has to be since OSS has been almost
exclusively implemented in the server space, and what do you know "it works"
and works well.

Free State...??? Maybe the reporter did not know the scope of the work, but
neither did the department that wanted the solution. How many man hours can
you buy for 40 Million? A hellava Lot!! Way more than the scope of work done
so far.

And finally ...........DATA......... I would almost term this the Holy Grail
of computing. Proprietary vendors, service providers etc are doing a really
really good job of capturing data and then making it unavailable to the
client. I have seen more than my fair share of projects that at the end the
service provider walks away with the IP in the form of the data. I know that
this is almost always the fault of the project managers, but am afraid that
it all links back to the above re training and skills and knowledge about
how to manage the data component.

YOU ARE SO RIGHT

Llewellyn

On 05/06/2013 12:19, Walter Smit wrote:
>
> Hi Ray
>
> I have been physically deployed in a national government department
> (DRDLR) for the past 18months and many of your points are very true. I 
> could write a whole essay about it, but here are some quick points.
>
> ?        Training and inexperienced staff ? I have had to teach
> graduated GIS people (from various universities) what the difference 
> is between files and folders. Seems to me that many universities are 
> missing the plot completely on how to make young people ready for 
> actual work.
>
> ?        ?not programmers? ? true, but the FOSS software I have used
> does not require any more programming than over-the-counter suites.
>
> ?        Enough PGPs? Correct, there are very few. It is however a
> fallacy that you need to be mentored by a PGP to be able to register 
> with Plato (I was not ? and I didn?t get the benefit of the 
> Grandfather clause either). I don?t know who started this lie, but it 
> seems to stop people from even trying to register.
>
> ?        I cannot comment on unscrupulous service providers ?
> solutions should be scalable.
>
> ?        Freestate in the limelight ? I actually asked someone with
> more knowledge than the reporters. He was of the opinion that the 
> service provider under quoted, because the range and scope of related 
> services to that website was enormous. Like following several 
> officials around to all their meetings for a year.
>
> ?        Why pay more than once? Petty politics and leaders protecting
> their own little empires. And corruption of course. We have tried 
> doing this for 18months?no luck yet. Also the communication between 
> provinces and levels of government is ludicrously poor. Do you know 
> what your direct neighbours in Environmental Affairs are using?
> Hopefully Enrico and Nacelle will be uploading their Bioregional Plans 
> to the sharing platform when they are done. The same platform where 
> you can see the EIAs from NEIMS?*shameless plug*
>
> ?        Data with known custodians. Have been doing this for
> 12months?it is very very difficult. Reasons: lack of high level regard 
> for (spatial) data, capacity and attitudes of ?it isn?t in my job 
> description?. Hopefully more OSD posts will change this. Remember that 
> very few departments have ever taken responsibility for spatial data ?
> ever. It is a massively foreign concept to them. We are making good 
> progress on this in 2 provinces. In the Northern Cape we have actually 
> got all the HODs to sign MOUs that they will be custodians for their 
> datasets. Appointing the actual person/post to an actual dataset is 
> more of a challenge.
>
> ?        GIS people in government. Lack of funding usually, or no GIS
> posts on their organograms. Government salaries for GIS people are 
> actually much higher than private sector.
>
> ?        IT support in government. Cannot comment on something that
> doesn?t exist J
>
> Personally I believe that departments would be better served by 
> implementing FOSS and spending the saved money on training. Because 
> training (regardless of software used) is what people really need. But 
> then again?Tswane?why change a system if it is already working for 
> them? And their staff have probably already had some decent training.
>
> Rant over,
>
> _______________________________________________
> Africa mailing list
> Africa at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa

--
Llewellyn Gush
Information Technology Manager
Joe Gqabi District Municipality

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/africa/attachments/20130605/36f830e1/attac
hment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Africa mailing list
Africa at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa

End of Africa Digest, Vol 77, Issue 9
*************************************

I'm part of the 49Million initiative.
http://www.49Million.co.za  

NB: This Email and its contents are subject to the Eskom Holdings Limited
EMAIL LEGAL NOTICE which can be viewed at
http://www.eskom.co.za/e-mail_legalnotice
_______________________________________________
Africa mailing list
Africa at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/africa