[Benchmarking] WFS testing: this year too?
Frank Warmerdam
warmerdam at pobox.com
Tue Jul 28 23:25:15 EDT 2009
Paul Ramsey wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Andrea Aime<aaime at opengeo.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> big question: shall we do some WFS testing this year too, or not?
>> Last year the test included a simple test over the "states" shapefile.
>>
>> I think MapServer people would like to show off the WFS speed
>> improvements, right?
>
> Probably. (Actually an interesting test variant would be to do a
> couple Mapserver versions while we're at it... I think I'll do that
> compile so the option is there.)
>
> To change the subject slightly, what rules do we want to have in terms
> of versions. The Mapserver version with the WFS speed improvement
> isn't released yet. I think it'll be released by FOSS4G, but is it
> fair to test pre-release and/or actually patch up code in the midst of
> the benchmarking? Is this a come-as-you-are event, or a bespoke event?
Paul,
My take on this is that we just need to provide clear disclosure on any
unreleased code used in the test and where possible try to do the tests
with the stock release.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
More information about the Benchmarking
mailing list