[Benchmarking] Last minute vote: shall we switch to 6600 requestsrun?

[Liujian (LJ) Qian]

Same here, + 0.

Thanks
LJ

Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH wrote:
> I vote + 0 for the same reason as Andrea. 
>
> Michael Smith
> US Army Corps of Engineers
> Hanover, NH
> Remote Sensing/GIS Center
>
> On Sep 1, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Andrea Aime <aaime at opengeo.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi,
>> during today's meeting it was discussed that some servers
>> are being disk bound during the tests, whilst others
>> are not.
>>
>> I can't speak for others, but for GeoServer the difference
>> between a disk bound run and one that is not is 5 to 10
>> times (in terms of req/sec).
>>
>> So it was suggested that we adopt a setup that has
>> 6600 different requests instead (see the other thread
>> about it).
>>
>> What shall we do? Vote please.
>> If we don't reach a consensus by the end of tomorrow
>> we'll just stick with what we have (as it's late).
>>
>> +0 for me (meaning, I think it's a good idea but also
>> that it's too late)
>>
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>
>> -- 
>> Andrea Aime
>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>> Expert service straight from the developers.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Benchmarking mailing list
>> Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Benchmarking mailing list
> Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking
>