[Fundraising] Re: [OSGeo-Board] Re: [Fundraising] RE: [OSGeo-Board] German OSGeo Chapter formation, bank account
gary.lang at autodesk.com
Mon Aug 21 10:35:56 PDT 2006
Having just personally hooked us up with China and personally worked on bringing up thr Japan chapter, I am not sure where this bias shows up.
--- Original Message ---
From: "Arnulf Christl" <arnulf.christl at ccgis.de>
Sent: Mon 8/21/06 1:24 pm
To: "board at board.osgeo.org" <board at board.osgeo.org>
Cc: "fundraising at fundraising.osgeo.org" <fundraising at fundraising.osgeo.org>, "discuss-de at visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org" <discuss-de at visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [Fundraising] Re: [OSGeo-Board] Re: [Fundraising] RE: [OSGeo-Board] German OSGeo Chapter formation, bank account
Gary Lang wrote:
> I also wonder what the impetus is. It seems like another governance
> issue, wherein local chapters could register their localized
> dissatisfaction with global decisions by funneling funds while enjoying
> the benefits that we provide.
> I can't think of a practical reason for doing this.
The practical reason is that Autodesk does not have to ship one set of
posters around the world in all languages but that all languages can
take care of it themselves. We need local money to pay for local
expenses. Else a lot simply ends up in superfluous transactions fees.
> enjoying the benefits that we provide.
Who is "we"? Are you talking of the core OSGeo PSC? That would be the
board. The board currently has a heavy Northern-American,
English-language bias. Ponder for a second why the US is the only
country without an own country code top level domain? I do not think
that this will apply to OSGeo. Hmmm. I'd rather say it more pro
actively. I want to prevent OSGeo from becoming just that. Probably I am
being too political and problematic again. Sorry. Guys. Uh - thats
another one, we have a male bias too...
> global decisions by funneling funds
This gives the impression that global decisions are directed by funds
which is not what we have set down in our charter. It would immediately
exclude any less monetary potential funders to influence global
decisions. I do not see a problem in a local chapter using local OSGeo
sponsoring for local OSGeo activities. This is just basic globalization,
think global, act local. The "global thinking" part will start to cost
money when we get an ED. The "act local" part is already happening
everywhere with people spending time and resources on OSGeo activity.
> --- Original Message ---
> From: "Dave McIlhagga (External)" <dmcilhagga at dmsolutions.ca>
> Sent: Mon 8/21/06 9:34 am
> To: "fundraising at fundraising.osgeo.org" <fundraising at fundraising.osgeo.org>
> Cc: "Arnulf Christl" <arnulf.christl at ccgis.de>, "board at board.osgeo.org"
> <board at board.osgeo.org>, "discuss-de at visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org"
> <discuss-de at visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org>, "brassat at geo-consortium.de"
> <brassat at geo-consortium.de>
> Subject: [OSGeo-Board] Re: [Fundraising] RE: [OSGeo-Board]
> German OSGeo Chapter formation, bank account
> Yup - just thinking that if this ends up being a model for other
> organizations around the world and somehow needed to be coordinated
> under a common OSGeo entity - yikes that sounds really complex,
> financially and legally.
> Probably the net result is the need for an arm's length entity with
> OSGeo affiliation -- but I'll let Gary do his homework with the
> legal/financial guys on that one.
> Gary Lang wrote:
> > I have no idea what the ramifications of doing this are on the corporate
> > body that is OSGeo, but I suspect it can create headaches for us. I'll
> > find out.
> > Gary
> > -----Original M
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Board