[OSGeo-Board] outline document from the F2F?

[Gary Lang]

Right. I don't think the post-budget minutes have been posted. 

Frank and Tyler - could you add the stuff you were driving?

--- Original Message ---
From: "Markus Neteler" <neteler.osgeo at gmail.com>
Sent: Tue 6/20/06 6:54 am
To: "Gary Lang" <gary.lang at autodesk.com>
Cc: "board at board.osgeo.org" <board at board.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Board] outline document from the F2F?

The budget part I have seen. Personally, I am also curious about:
(from agenda)

General
    * We should soon figure out what the title and requirements of
membership are. At Where 2.0 many people will want to know how to
become a member (also at FOSS4G2006 Lausanne)

 Board
    * Clarify re-elections of directors (2006 or 2007?)
    * General strategy discussions.
    * Discuss the stated priorities and how we meet them.

 VisCom
    * Decide migration of GRASS Newsletter Vol 4 to OSGeo Newsletter Vol 1

Maybe that's somewhere on the Wiki already?
I have linked the f2f action items to the minutes section.

Markus

On 6/20/06, Gary Lang <gary.lang at autodesk.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Most of them, at least the budget part - are on the Wiki and have been since
> Sunday. They are in the minutes section of the meeting page, at least when I
> posted them there they were. Did it not get published?
>
>  Gary
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From:   Markus Neteler [mailto:neteler.osgeo at gmail.com]
>  Sent:   Tue 6/20/2006 12:49 AM
>  To:     OSGeo-Board
>  Cc:
>  Subject:        Re: [OSGeo-Board] outline document from the F2F?
>
>  Dear all,
>
>  in fact, the notes are highly awaited... I hope you'll post them
>  soon! Thanks
>
>   Markus
>
>  On 6/20/06, Jo Walsh <jo at frot.org> wrote:
>  > dear all,
>  >
>  > I'm hoping that Gary and/or Laura has a copy of the outline document
>  > that described what we talked about at the F2F session before Where2.0.
>  >
>  > Would it be possible to post it here, mostly for Markus' and Venka's
>  > benefit, also so we can have an "OMG what were we thinking" moment and
>  > think over what needs to be bumped up the agenda for board meetings?
>  >
>  > Does FunCom have enough remit now to have an appropriate amount of fun,
>  > or is the onus still on the board to confirm more direction?
>  >
>  > cheers,
>  >
>  >
>  > jo
>  >
>  >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> board-unsubscribe at board.osgeo.org
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: board-help at board.osgeo.org
>  >
>  >
>
>
>  --
>  Open Source Geospatial Foundation
>  http://www.osgeo.org/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: board-unsubscribe at board.osgeo.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: board-help at board.osgeo.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://www.osgeo.org/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20060620/9133db56/attachment.htm>