[Board] Fwd: [SAC] Re: Motion for Trac/SVN/mailman for spatialindex

Jeroen Ticheler Jeroen.Ticheler at geocat.net
Mon Jul 13 19:30:20 PDT 2009


Hi Howard,
It wasn't really meant as a vote, more an OK without further  
discussion needed from my part. Next time I will write "It is OK for  
me" so you know I read your email, which I think is nicer than just  
keeping completely quiet :-)
Cheers,
Jeroen

On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:24 PM, Howard Butler wrote:

>
> On Jul 13, 2009, at 9:22 PM, Jeroen Ticheler wrote:
>
>> +1 from me.
>> Jeroen
>>
>
> If I remember correctly, our procedure for non-project hosting by  
> SAC was for SAC to notify the board that they planned to do it, and  
> then for the board to have a couple of days to shoot it down or hold  
> it up in any way.  The board shouldn't have to vote on this motion,  
> just complain if they're saying "no" :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Howard
>
>
>> On Jul 13, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Howard Butler wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> From: Daniel Morissette <dmorissette at mapgears.com>
>>>> Date: July 13, 2009 9:36:38 AM CDT
>>>> To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo <sac at lists.osgeo.org 
>>>> >
>>>> Subject: Re: [SAC] Re: Motion for Trac/SVN/mailman for spatialindex
>>>> Reply-To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo <sac at lists.osgeo.org 
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Howard Butler wrote:
>>>>> On Jun 1, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Friday in ticket http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/379 Howard  
>>>>>> motioned
>>>>>> for SAC to provide spatialindex with trac/svn/mailman  
>>>>>> services.  I can't
>>>>>> seem to find the original email in my mailbox, but I am  
>>>>>> seconding his
>>>>>> motion and voting:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 Frank
>>>>> Any other +1's on this so I can move forward?
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>
>>> Declaring this motion passed and forwarding on to the OSGeo Board  
>>> for a couple of days to comment (or reject) before implementing.
>>>
>>> For the board, spatialindex is a small LGPL project that  
>>> implements a number of rtree indexing variants in C++.  I don't  
>>> ever see it being large enough to incubate, but it is an important  
>>> part of the ecosystem regardless.
>>>
>>> Howard
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Board mailing list
>>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>




More information about the Board mailing list