Michael P. Gerlek
mpg at flaxen.com
Fri Aug 10 08:59:57 PDT 2012
Oh, good catch! -- I agree, the appointed person should have a 1 year term.
On Aug 10, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>> On the practical issue of replacing Jo, the obvious solution is to appoint
>> one more new board member based on the results of the ongoing election. Does
>> anyone have any procedural issue with this, or do we just go ahead and do
>> it? Do we need a board motion to approve that course of action?
> Right now the election cycle alternates between 5 and 4 new directors
> to keep some continuity from year to year. This is a 5 year so adding
> 6 2-year terms would switch it to 6/3 election cycle. The 6th
> director could get a 1 year term if keeping the 5/4 rotation is
More information about the Board