[Board] Fwd: [OSGeo-Discuss] Fwd: Foss4g 2012 ???

[Michael P. Gerlek]

> Perhaps OSGeo itself should take care of the crucial web site and "just"
> receive content snippets from LOC? This would somewhat avoid delays.

Actually it might be the just reverse: **if** the LOC was running efficiently, they'd probably want to have control over the website so they could keep it tuned and updated as they need to, without having to wait for someone else (OSGeo) to do it for them.

Using the site as a thermometer is a good idea, though. In the current case, the temperature reading is pretty low -- the molecules aren't bumping around very fast at all :-(

-mpg


> -----Original Message-----
> From: board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Markus Neteler
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 1:13 PM
> To: Seven (aka Arnulf)
> Cc: OSGeo-Board
> Subject: Re: [Board] Fwd: [OSGeo-Discuss] Fwd: Foss4g 2012 ???
> 
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Seven (aka Arnulf) <seven at arnulf.us> wrote:
> > We have been trying to get a
> > website work over the past three months - to no avail.
> 
> I wonder about one thing: currently it is in the responsibility of the local
> team to create the web site. Like this we use it as "thermometer" to
> understand the local progress on the conference preparations. But
> does this make sense?
> Perhaps OSGeo itself should take care of the crucial web site and "just"
> receive content snippets from LOC? This would somewhat avoid delays.
> 
> Just a thought,
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board