[Board] motions for the meeting 2014-09-13

[Jachym Cepicky]

Darell, this does not apply at 2014, as well as it does not apply at 2015,
but we shall have this politics from 2016 on forward.

We can only politely ask you to do so, and be thankful for your effort to
make things open as possible.

Thanks one more time

Jachym

Send from cellphone

-- 
Jachym Cepicky
e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com
URL: http://les-ejk.cz
GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp

Give your code freedom with PyWPS -http://pywps.wald.intevation.org
On Sep 14, 2014 12:11 PM, "Darrell Fuhriman" <darrell at garnix.org> wrote:

>
> > * the next FOSS4G (2016) and afterwards, OSGeo board requires
> > *completely* open budget, including soponsorships, income for
>
> I mentioned this to Jachym last night, and I have no problem with this
> (and I've said all along I'm happy to share our budget with anyone who
> asks), but I would suggest that sponsorships be rolled up into one number,
> simply because there are negotiations that happen with different sponsors
> that may not be clear in the spreadsheet why one sponsor paid a different
> amount than another at ostensibly the same level and that could lead to
> confusion and annoyance.
>
> d.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20140914/e2de4720/attachment.htm>