[Board] motions for the meeting 2014-09-13

[Bart van den Eijnden]

Right, the only issue I see is that we did not tell this to people before they ran in the election. I.e. by running in the election you agree that the (aggregated) voting results may be published. 

Or did we and I missed it?

Best regards,
Bart

On 16 Sep 2014, at 10:02, Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas <jsanz at osgeo.org> wrote:

> El 16/09/14 a las #4, Bart van den Eijnden escribió:
>>>> * to publish last board and charter member elections on the internet
>>>> withe detail numbers of +1's and -1's for each nominee
>>> 
>>> I’d like to hear Jorge’s thoughts on this first actually before voting
>> 
>> Changed to +1 after reading that Jorge sees no issues here.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Bart
> 
> Bart, just to extend myself a little bit on this, I don't see any
> concern on publishing aggregated Yes/No/Abstain's on board or charter
> members elections. Publishing what level of support our candidates have
> had it's good IMO, even for those that haven't had as much as they could
> expect.
> 
> ALL candidates, specially those for the board, have our most sincere
> support and recognition, they are our best, and our most important asset
> as a community and I hope they don't get annoyed or pissed off by being
> on the lower level of support; someone has to have it.
> 
> At the end we have to see it as an exercise of assertiveness and
> transparency.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -- 
> Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas
> http://es.osgeo.org
> http://jorgesanz.net
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board