[Board] Minutes and motions from 15/12/10 meeting

[Jody Garnett]

I do not think our bylaws work like a PSC (i.e. -1 is not a veto). At least
that is how it was described in our initial introduction as board members...

--
Jody Garnett

On 18 December 2015 at 09:50, Michael Smith <michael.smith.erdc at gmail.com>
wrote:

> There was a couple of -1's on the LocationTech representation so that one
> didn't pass
>
> Mike
> From: Board <board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Jody Garnett <
> jody.garnett at gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, December 18, 2015 at 12:46 PM
> To: Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at>
> Cc: osgeo-board List <board at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [Board] Minutes and motions from 15/12/10 meeting
>
> Thanks Anita: I think we are mostly looking to tally up the votes
> "confirmed by email". It looks like all motions passed.
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 18 December 2015 at 09:42, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:
>
>> ​I've summarized the feedback so far:
>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_2015-12-10#Minutes
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Anita​
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Vasile Craciunescu <
>> vasile at geo-spatial.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jody,
>>>
>>> I have no problem with Mike appointment as representative at
>>> LocationTech. And you are right, we have a preexisting relationship. So I
>>> change my vote to +1. Anyway, I really want to add the LT subject in our
>>> face2face meeting. Right now, within the community (and us, the board) we
>>> have this tense atmosphere which is contra-productive. Let's have a
>>> constructive discussion on this subject. For sure, both sides did mistakes.
>>> However, fixing should not be complicated if both parts have good faith.
>>> Let's build bridges and not fences.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Vasile
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/16/15 9:56 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>>
>>>>     2.  Recognize mdsmith as our representative to LocationTech
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Small clarification on this agenda topic - the motion is only to
>>>> recognize mdsmith as representative - we have a preexisting relationship
>>>> with LocationTech (which is not the subject of this motion.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Board mailing list
>>>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Vasile Crăciunescu
>>> geo-spatial.org: An elegant place for sharing geoKnowledge & geoData
>>> http://www.geo-spatial.org
>>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/geo-spatial
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Board mailing list
>>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Board mailing list
>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>
>
> _______________________________________________ Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20151218/dae6711a/attachment.htm>