[Board] Minutes and motions from 15/12/10 meeting

[Jody Garnett]

Confirmed (Section 4.5. and Section 4.6).

Looks like we need all board members to respond when voting via email.
For normal meeting motions require meeting quorum and the are passed based
on vote of majority of those present.

--
Jody Garnett

On 18 December 2015 at 09:53, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:

> I do not think our bylaws work like a PSC (i.e. -1 is not a veto). At
> least that is how it was described in our initial introduction as board
> members...
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On 18 December 2015 at 09:50, Michael Smith <michael.smith.erdc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> There was a couple of -1's on the LocationTech representation so that one
>> didn't pass
>>
>> Mike
>> From: Board <board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Jody Garnett <
>> jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>> Date: Friday, December 18, 2015 at 12:46 PM
>> To: Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at>
>> Cc: osgeo-board List <board at lists.osgeo.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Board] Minutes and motions from 15/12/10 meeting
>>
>> Thanks Anita: I think we are mostly looking to tally up the votes
>> "confirmed by email". It looks like all motions passed.
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>> On 18 December 2015 at 09:42, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:
>>
>>> ​I've summarized the feedback so far:
>>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_2015-12-10#Minutes
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Anita​
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Vasile Craciunescu <
>>> vasile at geo-spatial.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jody,
>>>>
>>>> I have no problem with Mike appointment as representative at
>>>> LocationTech. And you are right, we have a preexisting relationship. So I
>>>> change my vote to +1. Anyway, I really want to add the LT subject in our
>>>> face2face meeting. Right now, within the community (and us, the board) we
>>>> have this tense atmosphere which is contra-productive. Let's have a
>>>> constructive discussion on this subject. For sure, both sides did mistakes.
>>>> However, fixing should not be complicated if both parts have good faith.
>>>> Let's build bridges and not fences.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Vasile
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/16/15 9:56 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>     2.  Recognize mdsmith as our representative to LocationTech
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Small clarification on this agenda topic - the motion is only to
>>>>> recognize mdsmith as representative - we have a preexisting
>>>>> relationship
>>>>> with LocationTech (which is not the subject of this motion.)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Board mailing list
>>>>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Vasile Crăciunescu
>>>> geo-spatial.org: An elegant place for sharing geoKnowledge & geoData
>>>> http://www.geo-spatial.org
>>>> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/geo-spatial
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Board mailing list
>>>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Board mailing list
>>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ Board mailing list
>> Board at lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20151218/c2ace6c5/attachment.htm>