[Board] [OSGeo-Conf] Looking for the keeper of the videos from FOSS4GNA- PDX (2014)
Seven (aka Arnulf)
seven at arnulf.us
Thu Sep 24 00:52:29 PDT 2015
...just a note from the side: In my experience organizations like OSGeo
can get a lot more done if some people with official roles can have a
budget. Like in:
The officer XY can authorize expenditures of up to US$ XXXX without the
need to ask the board, make a motion, wait for all to answer, etc. The
officer will report expenditures at the next board meeting and stands
responsible. The board can at any time cancel any budget.
Officers could be: The President, SAC committe member, Marketing
Committee member, etc.
Process: The officer / committee member explains the need to the board
and requests for a budget. The board discusses and either grants or
denies the budget. Grants can be time limited. Every request has to be
renewed (annually, quarterly, monthly).
Could help to become more reactive and somewhat relieves the board.
Have fun,
Arnulf
On 23.09.2015 22:44, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> Ok agreed Peter and Kristin, I will start a motion now. I fully agree
> with you both.
>
>
> -jeff
>
>
>
> On 2015-09-23 6:37 PM, Kristin Bott wrote:
>> Just adding another voice to the "the $200 is worth it" -- I've shared
>> those videos w/ students as part of their intro to not just geospatial
>> things, but also open source in general (Novotny), data visualization
>> and (tool) design (Bostock), as well as how data can be important
>> outside of 'just' science and / or academia (Shaw).
>>
>> I have no particular pull here, but it seems like $200 is a tiny sum in
>> favor of a larger greater good (and increased visibility for FOSS4G,
>> which seems to be the biggest public moment for OSGeo).
>>
>> -k.bott
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Peter Batty <peter at ebatty.com
>> <mailto:peter at ebatty.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jeff, yes I'd support doing that. If you are willing to make the
>> motion that would be great. I think it's an important part of
>> OSGeo's mission to keep these videos online - from what several of
>> us have heard from different sources, people see them as valuable. I
>> think $200 is a small amount in the scheme of things, and this buys
>> us some time to figure out our longer term solution.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peter.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Jeff McKenna
>> <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
>> <mailto:jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I agree Peter. Do you think this calls for a Board vote now, to
>> approve the $200 payment from the OSGeo Treasurer? Let me know
>> and I will start that vote if needed.
>>
>> -jeff
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2015-09-23 5:51 PM, Peter Batty wrote:
>>
>> I also got an email from a friend who teaches some college
>> courses and
>> he said that he regularly makes use of this material and
>> would really
>> like to see it back online asap. I think we should seriously
>> consider
>> spending the $200 to reinstate the videos in the short term
>> (for one
>> more year) while we figure out a longer term strategy.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Sara Safavi
>> <sara at sarasafavi.com <mailto:sara at sarasafavi.com>
>> <mailto:sara at sarasafavi.com <mailto:sara at sarasafavi.com>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all --
>>
>> I'll leave the discussion over service and account
>> decisions to
>> others, but until the issue is settled is it possible
>> for us to
>> retrieve old Vimeo-hosted videos (download, etc), or
>> are they lost
>> in the ether until the account is renewed?
>>
>> I ask because, coincidentally to this thread, last week
>> I had
>> someone randomly find my presentation page from FOSS4G
>> 2014 online.
>> They emailed to let me know the video was 404ing, and
>> ask if by
>> chance I had another source for it (unfortunately I
>> don't).
>> Interesting coincidence, and one that could easily
>> affect more than
>> just myself & my PDX talk.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Sara
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Steven Feldman
>> <shfeldman at gmail.com <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>
>> <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> Any proposal needs to be sustainable in terms of
>> costs and
>> volunteer time (e.g. for recording, uploading
>> indexing etc).
>> Using multiple services is going to become very
>> cumbersome and
>> is unlikely to be sustainable in my opinion unless
>> the video
>> volunteers have a lot of time available.
>>
>> Whilst an archive is a nice to have most of the
>> presentations at
>> FOSS4G have a limited shelf life and we need to
>> balance the
>> effort involved in having downloadable archives
>> with the
>> likelihood of them ever being used and the cost of
>> maintaining them.
>>
>>
>> ______
>> Steven
>>
>>
>> On 21 Sep 2015, at 17:01, Basques, Bob
>> (CI-StPaul)
>> <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
>> <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
>> <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
>> <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>>> wrote:
>>
>> (I’m not allow to post to the CONF list, should
>> we take this
>> to the GENERAL list)
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> But how to enforce that type of
>> indexing/tagging operation.
>>
>> No big argument on any of your listed
>> capabilities below, only
>> that they are not obviously made known by the
>> YouTube
>> service. I’ve known for a long time how to
>> download from
>> YouTube, but it’s also not as plain of an
>> explanation how to
>> do so as on other sites.
>>
>> Youtube seems to not focus on sharing the
>> actual content, even
>> though they may allow it. And I’m not totally
>> convince, after
>> I went back and read their usage agreement
>> again. Still a
>> little foggy on the reuse aspects.
>>
>> I guess this topic would be best settled by
>> using more than on
>> service as a repository. Maybe require two or
>> three different
>> free services to be used would be the best
>> approach.
>>
>> bobb
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 21, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Andrew Ross
>> <andrew.ross at eclipse.org
>> <mailto:andrew.ross at eclipse.org>
>> <mailto:andrew.ross at eclipse.org
>> <mailto:andrew.ross at eclipse.org>>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Bob,
>>
>> Some of this may be things you & others may
>> already know.
>>
>> The 15 minute limit is quickly waived if
>> you ask for it &
>> even automatically in a lot of cases.
>> Google it & you'll see
>> info about this.
>>
>> For what it's worth, videos in YouTube can
>> be shared
>> trivially via. email or social media and
>> embedded into any
>> external site. This is very common and a
>> good idea.
>>
>> Additionally, in my opinion, within
>> YouTube, it is best
>> practice to complete meta data for the
>> video (talk title,
>> description) and tag the videos with
>> keywords (project,
>> topic, technology, event, etc.) This makes
>> them a lot easier
>> to find and relate to other talks shared by
>> other people on
>> the same topics.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> A
>>
>> On 21/09/15 10:53, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
>> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I like to think of these types of media
>> as a Library of
>> sorts. And keeping them available is
>> in the best interests
>> of the community. I have no way of
>> calculating the benefits
>> however.
>>
>> Back to Youtube uploading complication
>> (as I see them),
>> there are defaults like 15min length,
>> etc. Things that the
>> average joe may have problems with as
>> far as uploading
>> something. The limit can be increased,
>> but that would
>> require a media lib rain of some sort
>> to manage the account.
>>
>> Also, how would/could the process of
>> indexing and binding to
>> projects be best accomplished with
>> YouTube? Via an outside
>> database, or?? I ask this now since
>> it’s seems relevant if
>> this topic leads to it’s logical
>> conclusion of bringing
>> media together into a single repository.
>>
>> bobb
>>
>>
>> On Sep 19, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Fenoy
>> Gerald
>> <gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr
>> <mailto:gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr>
>> <mailto:gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr
>> <mailto:gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> David,
>> I personally feel that it is better
>> to react than doing
>> nothing,even if,as you said "the
>> technology is moving
>> fast", still many did so amazing
>> work that we should keep
>> trace of it …
>>
>> Nevertheless, I wonder if we can
>> ask so much work to our so
>> loved SAC community without
>> expensing at least a small
>> amount of money …Sorry I know I
>> spoke too much about it
>> during this week, but still … if
>> our president deserve to
>> have some income, SAC do deserve
>> also !
>>
>> So what will be the next move
>> exactly, if any ?
>>
>> Le 20 sept. 2015 à 02:37, David
>> Percy <percyd at pdx.edu
>> <mailto:percyd at pdx.edu>
>> <mailto:percyd at pdx.edu
>> <mailto:percyd at pdx.edu>>> a écrit :
>>
>> It seems like we should have a
>> permanent archive on our
>> own servers, in addition to a
>> public consumption interface
>> like one of the services we
>> have been discussing.
>> This starts to get into a long
>> term digital stewardship
>> issue. We need to perhaps have
>> a longer view... With
>> content tags and stuff. But not
>> so difficult that it
>> becomes a task that is hard to
>> manage, and therefore never
>> gets done. Maybe a simple
>> CMS... Aren't we using drupal
>> already?
>>
>> Unless we think these talks are
>> more ephemeral due to the
>> rapidly changing technology.
>>
>> In which case we can leave the
>> issue in the more ad hoc
>> status that it is, and just let
>> each LOC deal with it.
>> Just a thought,
>> Percy
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 7:21
>> AM, Steven Feldman
>> <shfeldman at gmail.com
>> <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>
>> <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com
>> <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>> I don’t see $200/year of value
>> in Vimeo. Surely we want
>> our content to have the widest
>> possible real, won’t that
>> come through YouTube?
>> ______
>> Steven
>>
>>
>> On 19 Sep 2015, at 03:10,
>> Andrew Ross
>> <andrew.ross at eclipse.org
>> <mailto:andrew.ross at eclipse.org>
>>
>> <mailto:andrew.ross at eclipse.org
>> <mailto:andrew.ross at eclipse.org>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Bob,
>>
>> They are creative commons
>> licensed and downloading is
>> trivial. Just landed
>> returning from Seoul so I'll post
>> how to do so tomorrow.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> A
>>
>> On September 18, 2015
>> 5:43:49 PM EDT, "Basques, Bob
>> (CI-StPaul)"
>> <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
>> <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
>>
>> <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
>>
>> <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>>>
>> wrote:
>> Andrew,
>>
>> I have a problem with the
>> YouTube License. Once it’s up
>> there, they get to use it
>> however they want, forever.
>>
>> Also, I (still) don’t see a
>> method for downloading
>> anything for saving as a
>> local copy from YouTube (at
>> least not legally).
>>
>> Vimeo let’s you
>> download/copy, and even pick who sees
>> your content., etc. I’ll
>> be the first to admit though,
>> that not everyone will care
>> about this, until they do,
>> and then it will be too
>> late.
>>
>> bobb
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 18, 2015, at
>> 2:52 PM, Andrew Ross
>>
>> <andrew.ross at eclipse.org
>> <mailto:andrew.ross at eclipse.org>
>>
>> <mailto:andrew.ross at eclipse.org
>>
>> <mailto:andrew.ross at eclipse.org>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> YouTube has a much
>> bigger community, is free, and
>> the
>> search/indexing can't
>> be beat.
>>
>> I like Vimeo, have used
>> it a fair amount, but this is no
>> contest.. YouTube wins
>> imho.
>>
>> A
>>
>> On September 18, 2015
>> 11:06:30 AM PDT, Steven Feldman
>> <shfeldman at gmail.com
>> <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>
>> <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com
>> <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>>>
>> wrote:
>> Is Vimeo preferred to
>> YouTube? Why?
>>
>> Andrew Ross post 90+
>> 2013 videos on YouTube at zero
>> cost
>>
>> Regards
>> Steven
>>
>>
>> +44 (0) 7958 924101
>>
>> <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%207958%20924101>
>>
>> <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%207958%20924101>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 18 Sep 2015, at
>> 18:57, Darrell Fuhriman
>> <darrell at garnix.org
>> <mailto:darrell at garnix.org>
>> <mailto:darrell at garnix.org
>> <mailto:darrell at garnix.org>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Aww crap.
>>
>> Our vimeo pro account
>> expired, and apparently that took
>> some of the videos
>> offline. I didn’t think that was
>> going to happen — I
>> guess I mis-read the
>> consequences.
>>
>> FWIW, I think OSGeo
>> should keep this account up and
>> consolidate all the
>> foss4g videos there (including
>> the
>> forthcoming 2015).
>>
>> Board: is this a
>> service that OSGeo is willing
>> to pay
>> for? It’s $200/year.
>>
>> Darrell
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 18, 2015, at
>> 10:11, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
>>
>> <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
>>
>> <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
>>
>>
>> <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
>>
>> <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Edit . . .
>>
>> Oops, I mean just
>> FOSS4G. Looks like a few of the
>> videos that were on
>> Vimeo have gone missing, besides
>> mine. At least based
>> on the links from here: Maybe
>> something has changed
>> on Vimeo??
>>
>>
>> http://2014.foss4g.org/schedule/sessions/index.html
>>
>>
>>
>> bobb
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 18, 2015, at
>> 11:47 AM, Basques, Bob
>> (CI-StPaul)
>>
>> <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
>>
>> <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
>>
>>
>> <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
>>
>> <mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I’m looking for the
>> Keeper of the conference
>> videos from
>> FOSS4GNA PDX (2014)
>>
>> I see a lot of them on
>> Vimeo, but the one I did seems to
>> be missing. It used to
>> be there. Unless I’m using a
>> bad search filter . . .
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> bobb
>>
>>
>>
>> Conference_dev
>> mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>> Conference_dev
>> mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>> Conference_dev
>> mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>> Conference_dev
>> mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev
>> mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> David Percy ("Percy")
>> -Geospatial Data Manager
>> -Web Map Wrangler
>> -GIS Instructor
>> Portland State University
>> -gisgeek.pdx.edu
>> <http://gisgeek.pdx.edu>
>> <http://gisgeek.pdx.edu>
>> -geology.pdx.edu
>> <http://geology.pdx.edu>
>> <http://geology.pdx.edu>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>>
>> Gérald Fenoy
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Djay
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeff McKenna
>> MapServer Consulting and Training Services
>> http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
More information about the Board
mailing list