[Board] Fwd: Fwd: Consider extending deadline for board voting
Massimiliano Cannata
massimiliano.cannata at supsi.ch
Fri Sep 25 05:52:46 PDT 2015
Sorry,
the question is the subject of the mail?
"extending deadline for board voting"
or is just an invitation for the future?
Sorry if I don't understand.
Maxi
2015-09-25 11:57 GMT+02:00 Vasile Craciunescu <vasile at geo-spatial.org>:
> Forwarding you a message from Stephen Woodbridge.
>
> Best,
> Vasile
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Fwd: Consider extending deadline for board voting
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:52:42 -0400
> From: Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com>
> To: Vasile Craciunescu <vasile at geo-spatial.org>
>
> Vasile,
>
> I tried sending this to the board list, but I guess only board members
> are subscribed to that list or maybe I have to sub to the list if it is
> open. Anyway please feel free to forward this to the board.
>
> I already looked that the candidates and voted so maybe it is not that
> big of a deal, but I think it would make sense to to consider these
> ideas for the future to improve our overall voting process. I think this
> year went pretty smoothly overall, so excellent job on your part.
>
> Thanks,
> -Steve
>
> On 9/24/2015 5:33 PM, Mail Delivery System wrote:
>
>> Subject: Consider extending deadline for board voting
>> From: Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com>
>> Date: 9/24/2015 5:19 PM
>>
>> To: board at lists.osgeo.org
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm sure you have already considered this but I think it might be a good
>> idea to consider extending the deadline for board voting because a lot
>> of the candidates have been at FOSSG and/or other conferences and I
>> think it would be good to get the candidates to respond to these
>> questions. Vasile already mention that about 1/2 the members have
>> already voted, so maybe it is moot at this point.
>>
>> Regardless of whether this does or does not happen this year, I think
>> that it would be a good idea to make it part of the planning from future
>> elections. You might have a schedule like:
>>
>> * cut-off date for nominations
>> * 1 week for candidates to answers a fix set of questions
>> * then the elections
>>
>> You might even consider putting in place something where any candidate
>> that does not answer the questionnaire would get dropped from the voting
>> because if they can not make time to post answers, then you might want
>> to consider that they also might not have time for spending on board
>> related activities. While I understand that schedule conflicts for that
>> week might occur having a schedule and know the plan should allow them
>> to work around that. And maybe they would have more time in a future
>> election.
>>
>> Anyway, thanks for all you have done to keep OSGeo running!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> -Steve W
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>
--
*Massimiliano Cannata*
Professore SUPSI in ingegneria Geomatica
Responsabile settore Geomatica
Istituto scienze della Terra
Dipartimento ambiente costruzione e design
Scuola universitaria professionale della Svizzera italiana
Campus Trevano, CH - 6952 Canobbio
Tel. +41 (0)58 666 62 14
Fax +41 (0)58 666 62 09
massimiliano.cannata at supsi.ch
*www.supsi.ch/ist <http://www.supsi.ch/ist>*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20150925/cc50fd23/attachment.htm>
More information about the Board
mailing list