[Board] [EXTERNAL] Re: About some process clarification

[Anita Graser]

Hi board,

I've only been following discussions around OpenHub for a few months now.
What's the whole idea of OSGeo "claiming" anything there?
I think I remember that some projects were not too happy with the
move/terminology. Maybe the motivation could be spelled out on the wiki
page. It's currently not clear why we do that.

Best wishes,
Anita



On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Michael Smith <
michael.smith.erdc at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> ----
> Michael Smith
>
> US Army Corps
> Remote Sensing GIS/Center
> michael.smith at usace.army.mil
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Board <board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Venkatesh
> Raghavan <raghavan at media.osaka-cu.ac.jp>
> Date: Monday, February 22, 2016 at 12:25 AM
> To: OSGeo-Board <board at lists.osgeo.org>, "tomkralidis at gmail.com"
> <tomkralidis at gmail.com>, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz at loskot.net>, Jeff McKenna
> <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Board] About some process clarification
> Resent-From: Michael Smith <michael.smith at usace.army.mil>
>
> >Dear Board,
> >
> >I would like to move a motion to approve
> >
> >1) Business process on managing OSGeo Open Hub requests
> >using trac ticketing as outlined in [1]
>
> +1
>
> >
> >2) Managing OSGeo Service Provider updates using trac ticketing as
> >outlined in [2]
>
> +1
>
> >
> >I vote +1 for this motion.
> >
> >Best
> >
> >Venka
> >
> >[1] BlockedBlockedhttp://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OpenHubBlocked
> >[2]
> >BlockedBlockedhttps://
> wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Service_Provider_DirectoryBlocke
> >d#Business_Processes
> >
> >On 2016/02/19 11:33, Venkatesh Raghavan wrote:
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> I recently had a very fruitful interaction with Tom Kralidis
> >> regarding some items listed below that require clarification of process
> >> and decouple the from specific people/emails. This would ensure that our
> >> communications related to these items become more sustainable and
> >> transparent and traceable.
> >>
> >> a) OpenHUB OSGeo [1] admin
> >> b) OSGeo Service Provider updates [3]
> >>
> >> Regarding item a) above, issues/requests related to OSGeo Open Hub
> >> were going to mailing list or info at osgeo.org and maybe in some
> >> cases directly to the Managers (Mateusz Loskot and Jeff McKenna).
> >>
> >> Tom and I agreed that it would be better to have documented process on
> >> OSGeo
> >> Wiki that people could know about the option of filing a trac ticket
> >> and interact with SAC directly. Tom has kindly made a draft wiki page
> >>[2]
> >> documenting the process. So we all agree with the process described in
> >> [2],
> >> it can be adopted/approved and communicated on our website.
> >>
> >> Regarding the item b) OSGeo Service Provider updates, request for
> >>updates
> >> are currently directed to info at osgeo.org [see [3]). Tom has also
> >> kindly added
> >> details about the process of filing trac tickets in our Service
> >> Provider Wiki page
> >> [4]. So, if we agree to the process mentioned in [4] the same can be
> >> communicated
> >> on our website.
> >>
> >> Tom, thanks for your input and suggestions. I am also marking CC to
> >> Mateusz and
> >> Jeff as they are managing OSGeo-OpenHub [2].
> >>
> >> Best
> >>
> >> Venka
> >>
> >> [1] BlockedBlockedhttps://www.openhub.net/orgs/OSGeoBlocked
> >> [2] BlockedBlockedhttp://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OpenHubBlocked
> >> [3] BlockedBlockedhttp://www.osgeo.org/spd_helpBlocked
> >> [4]
> >>
> >>BlockedBlockedhttps://
> wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Service_Provider_DirectoryBlock
> >>ed#Business_Processes
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Board mailing list
> >> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> >> BlockedBlockedhttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/boardBlocked
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Board mailing list
> >Board at lists.osgeo.org
> >BlockedBlockedhttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/boardBlocked
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20160224/e305b9f8/attachment.htm>