[Board] Not graduated OSGeo project...

Fri Oct 21 01:46:45 PDT 2016

Yes, and Helena Mitasova was nominated as the contact person for Geo4All. This should be reflected in the websites, promotional materials etc.

I also strongly suggest that Geo4All link should be there in the OSGeo index page , as this is our official outreach (official MoUs with external organisations). So it is important to highlight this and not to duplicate efforts.

Suchith

________________________________________
From: Board <board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Dirk Frigne <dirk.frigne at geosparc.com>
Sent: 21 October 2016 8:36 AM
To: board at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Board] Not graduated OSGeo project...

Venka et All,

It was w board decision on the face2face meeting in Januari 2016 to
replace the Education committee by  Geo4All. This was mentionned in the
meeting. From the meeting notes:

MC: Recognize Geo4all is the new educational outreach of OSgeo
MS: seconded
Passed

Relationship with Geo4all

    The have decided for scenario 1B
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/GeoForAll_OSGeo_Relationship#Scenario_1B
    We are dissolving the disfunct education committee and establish
Geo4all as the new education outreach of OSGeo
    Geo4all needs to provide a contact personal

Regards,
D.

On 21/10/2016 01:27, Venkatesh Raghavan wrote:
> Maxi, Cameron and all,
>
> Perhaps the term "Education Committee" could be replaced with
> Geo4All as it represents the educational outreach project of
> OSGeo.
>
> Mapbuilder which is listed as an Foundation project has
> retired [1] and and can be removed or shown
> "Past Project".
>
> Regarding "Public Geodata Project", I expressed my views in
> the recent e-mail [2]. I would be happy to work together with
> anyone who would like to take up on forming the "Data4All"
> initiative with OSM, HOT and others in the Open Data
> community.
>
> Best
>
> Venka
>
> [1]
> http://cameronshorter.blogspot.jp/2008/07/end-of-life-for-community-mapbuilder-we_29.html
> [2] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2016-October/016812.html
>
> On 10/21/2016 4:53 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>> Hi Maxi,
>>
>> I'm not sure our software incubation checklist is the correct criteria
>> to apply to "OSGeo Outreach Projects".
>>
>> --
>>
>> The education committee is a huge success story of OSGeo, attracting
>> educators from around the world who are promoting Open Source to
>> future generations. OSGeo should be promoting this community.
>>
>> OSGeo-Live likewise has hundreds of contributors, provides a easy way
>> for new users to find out about Open Source projects, and maintains a
>> high level of quality. It should be promoted. Note, we have considered
>> taking OSGeo-Live through graduation. Checklist here:
>>
>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Incubation_Graduation_Checklist
>>
>> One concern I have is that OSGeo-Live includes more projects than just
>> those incubated. A casual observer would naturally deduce that if
>> OSGeo-Live has reached incubation quality, then all included packages
>> should have also reached such quality. This assumption is incorrect
>> and should not be promoted by OSGeo, and is a reason for OSGeo-Live
>> not to be officially recognised as an OSGeo incubated project.
>>
>> --
>> The OSGeo Data Committee is a great idea, but has lost impetus. This
>> might be a candidate for dropping from the home page. Possibly we
>> should be pointing people to Open Street Map or similar.
>>
>> Warm regards, Cameron
>>
>> On 21/10/2016 12:20 AM, Massimiliano Cannata wrote:
>>> dear Board,
>>> in the OSGeo landing page (www.osgeo.org <http://www.osgeo.org>) in
>>> the "OSGeo projects" frame are listed the so called "Outreach Projects".
>>>
>>> To my understanding and knowledge these listed projects (Public
>>> Geospatial Data, Education and Curriculum, OSGeo Live) have not been
>>> nor incubated nor graduated.
>>>
>>> I'm therefore asking for clarification, and in the case my
>>> understanding is correct, to immediately remove these projects from
>>> the landing page.
>>>
>>> Two of them are actually committee, at the same level of the other
>>> OSGeo committee, that in my opinion should be equally promoted and
>>> listed togheter.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Maxi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Massimiliano Cannata*
>>>
>>> Professore SUPSI in ingegneria Geomatica
>>>
>>> Responsabile settore Geomatica
>>>
>>>
>>> Istituto scienze della Terra
>>>
>>> Dipartimento ambiente costruzione e design
>>>
>>> Scuola universitaria professionale della Svizzera italiana
>>>
>>> Campus Trevano, CH - 6952 Canobbio
>>>
>>> Tel. +41 (0)58 666 62 14
>>>
>>> Fax +41 (0)58 666 62 09
>>>
>>> massimiliano.cannata at supsi.ch <mailto:massimiliano.cannata at supsi.ch>
>>>
>>> _www.supsi.ch/ist <http://www.supsi.ch/ist>_
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Board mailing list
>>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Board mailing list
>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>

--
Yours sincerely,

ir. Dirk Frigne
CEO @geosparc

Geosparc n.v.
Brugsesteenweg 587
B-9030 Ghent
Tel: +32 9 236 60 18
GSM: +32 495 508 799

http://www.geomajas.org
http://www.geosparc.com

@DFrigne
be.linkedin.com/in/frigne

_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
Board at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.