[Board] PyWPS winter code sprint

[Jachym Cepicky]

Hi Dirk,

I believe, there is no problem with more projects at one event. It could
also be nice opportunity for those sprinters, who can not make it to US
this year for the c-tribe code sprint

J

st 14. 9. 2016 v 14:10 odesílatel Dirk Frigne <dirk.frigne at geosparc.com>
napsal:

> Luis,
>
> I think it is a good idea to seek further for funding.
> There is however not yet a decision of the board yet. I've put our
> discussion on Loomio and ask for consensus.
>
>
> https://www.loomio.org/d/8aTgt4pr/request-for-sponsoring-how-to-allocate-the-budget
>
> Dirk
>
> On 2016-09-14 13:30, Luí­s de Sousa wrote:
> > Thank you Dirk for these clarifications. I will seek funding from other
> > sources. Regards,
> >
> > Luís
> >
> > /Sent from ProtonMail <https://protonmail.ch>, encrypted email based in
> > Switzerland./
> >
> >
> >> -------- Original Message --------
> >> Subject: Re: [Board] PyWPS winter code sprint
> >> Local Time: 14 September 2016 11:25 AM
> >> UTC Time: 14 September 2016 09:25
> >> From: dirk.frigne at geosparc.com
> >> To: Luí­s de Sousa <luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch>
> >> Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>, board at lists.osgeo.org
> >> <board at lists.osgeo.org>
> >>
> >> Luis,
> >>
> >> Thank you for your suggestion.
> >>
> >> I don't think there is an issue on the number of attendants. And I think
> >> your question is a valid question. I think the board should discuss now
> >> and take a decision using the guidelines there are. Eventually improving
> >> the guidelines as a side result.
> >>
> >> Personally, I think you should try to find some sponsors amongst the
> >> companies supporting the platform and earning ervenue with it. Also the
> >> clients having the benefits of the work should consider sponsoring.
> >>
> >> For OSGeo it is very difficult to promote one project over another. In
> >> that way a code sprint open for all the projects should receive more
> >> support than a one project initiative. (but this are only my personal
> 2c).
> >> Another approach could be to distribute the budget amongst all the OSGeo
> >> projects, who then decide on their own what to do with the budget. In
> >> that case, I think your initiative should be elegible for funding. But
> >> if we want this, we should change the directives, Jody pointed at.
> >>
> >> Dirk
> >>
> >> On 2016-09-13 19:58, Luí­s de Sousa wrote:
> >> > Hi there Dirk,
> >> >
> >> > We could eventually include a parallel programme on PyCSW, since one
> of
> >> > the PSC members is also contributing to that project. However, the
> >> > number of attendants is limited to the lodgings provided by GeoCAT.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> > Luís
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> -------- Original Message --------
> >> >> Subject: Re: [Board] PyWPS winter code sprint
> >> >> Local Time: September 13, 2016 6:02 PM
> >> >> UTC Time: September 13, 2016 4:02 PM
> >> >> From: dirk.frigne at geosparc.com
> >> >> To: Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>, Luí­s de Sousa
> >> >> <luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch>
> >> >> board at lists.osgeo.org <board at lists.osgeo.org>
> >> >>
> >> >> I also see that there is an issue with giving value to a wide OSGeo
> >> >> community (multiple OSGeo projects).
> >> >> Could the sprint be extended towards other projects?
> >> >>
> >> >> Dirk.
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Yours sincerely,
> >>
> >>
> >> ir. Dirk Frigne
> >> CEO @geosparc
> >>
> >> Geosparc n.v.
> >> Brugsesteenweg 587
> >> B-9030 Ghent
> >> Tel: +32 9 236 60 18
> >> GSM: +32 495 508 799
> >>
> >> http://www.geomajas.org
> >> http://www.geosparc.com
> >>
> >> @DFrigne
> >> be.linkedin.com/in/frigne
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Yours sincerely,
>
>
> ir. Dirk Frigne
> CEO @geosparc
>
> Geosparc n.v.
> Brugsesteenweg 587
> B-9030 Ghent
> Tel: +32 9 236 60 18
> GSM: +32 495 508 799
>
> http://www.geomajas.org
> http://www.geosparc.com
>
> @DFrigne
> be.linkedin.com/in/frigne
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20160926/e5e5463b/attachment.htm>