[Board] [OSGeo-Discuss] Elections 2017 - grammar issues and ambiguity with nomination process
Cameron Shorter
cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Mon Aug 28 17:57:37 PDT 2017
Thanks Vasile for offering to look into the review.
Maybe answer/address what you can, then reach out to the board members
who helped draft the new process to clarify their intent as per
questions below?
I'm happy review for clarity if asked once intent has been defined.
Cheers, Cameron
On 27-Aug-17 8:57 PM, Vasile Craciunescu wrote:
> Dear Cameron,
>
> Thank you for your feedback and please accept my apologies for the
> delayed answer. It's true, along with Jeff, I'm responsible for this
> year elections. However, the new process was decided by the board [1].
> I will go through your suggestions and I will try to improve/better
> clarify the wiki page. Not sure if I'm the best person to answer all
> your questions.
>
> Best,
> Vasile
>
> [1] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_2016-8-24
>
> On 8/25/17 10:57 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>> Vasile is acting CRO, I would prefer he make any modifications (or
>> review) that page as he is responsible for elections this year.
>>
>> The board set the strategy, Vasile is implementing.
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:50 PM Cameron Shorter
>> <cameron.shorter at gmail.com <mailto:cameron.shorter at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jody, I assume someone would be able to correct the election 2017
>> process [1]?
>>
>> Who was involved in deciding the new process? I assume they will be
>> able to answer the questions below and be in a position to remove
>> the current ambiguity?
>>
>>
>> On 25/8/17 7:59 am, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>> Cameron the membership process page should be a bit easier to
>>> follow.
>>>
>>> * https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Membership_Process
>>>
>>> I took a couple laps through the membership process page, storing
>>> the 2014 procedure as a seperate page, sorry if I dropped your
>>> section on member profiles.
>>>
>>> And as indicated earlier these pages were not updated after the
>>> motion in 2016, your review / feedback / clarification is
>>> appreciated.
>>> --
>>> Jody Garnett
>>>
>>> On 24 August 2017 at 13:53, Cameron Shorter
>>> <cameron.shorter at gmail.com <mailto:cameron.shorter at gmail.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> OSGeo Board and CROs,
>>>
>>> Firstly, I think a simplified voting process is positive. Good
>>> idea. However the current statement for nominating charter
>>> members seems rushed as it has some grammar issues and
>>> ambiguity. The current statement is:
>>>
>>> /To be elected a charter member need a nomination by a current
>>> charter member and at least one other charter member seconding
>>> the nomination. Only veto can be raised by sending a private
>>> e-mail to the CRO that has to inform the board for an
>>> anonymous review. If the veto is accepted by the board, then
>>> the CRO shall make it public and the charter member is not
>>> elected. [1] /
>>>
>>> Questions:
>>> * Where are people to send nominations? I assume to
>>> OSGeo-Discuss list. If so, I suggest stating so above.
>>>
>>> * Our referenced Membership Process describes "Nominees should
>>> meet the Positive Attributes for Charter Members" [2]. I
>>> assume we would still want reference to this from the cover
>>> statement above?
>>> * Can we please expand on the veto process, and the level of
>>> transparency/privacy involved.
>>> ** Will the nominated person who has been vetoed be publicly
>>> named (this might be seen as insensitive and might be best to
>>> inform them privately).
>>> ** Will the person sending the veto be named?
>>> ** Will the board members votes be made public?
>>> ** Will the reasons someone has been excluded be made public?
>>> * I suggest we publish reasons someone might be vetoed in
>>> advance. Referencing the Positive Attributes [2] should
>>> suffice.
>>>
>>> Our voting process has dropped:
>>> "The CRO will invite new charter members to update (or create)
>>> their OSGeo Advocate profile, as per:
>>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Advocate#Process_for_becoming_an_OSGeo_Advocate"
>>> [3].
>>> I assume that is an oversight which we can put back.
>>>
>>> [1] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Election_2017
>>> [2]
>>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Membership_Process#Positive_Attributes_Positive_Attributes
>>> [3] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Membership_Process_2014#Voting
>>>
>>> On 24/8/17 9:43 am, Vasile Craciunescu wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> This year OSGeo elections started on Monday with the
>>>> nomination period for new Charter Members. The nomination
>>>> period is open for the next two weeks. Please help our
>>>> Foundation grow and nominate new Charter Members by
>>>> 2017-09-07.
>>>>
>>>> Elections page:
>>>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Election_2017
>>>>
>>>> Please help spread the word and also reach out to communities
>>>> who have
>>>> not yet been connected with OSGeo.
>>>>
>>>> Yours,
>>>> Vasile & Jeff (2017 CRO)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>> -- Cameron Shorter
>>> M+61 419 142 254 <tel:+61%20419%20142%20254>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Board mailing list
>>> Board at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Board at lists.osgeo.org>
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- Cameron Shorter
>> M +61 419 142 254
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>
>
--
Cameron Shorter, Software and Data Solutions Manager,
Jirotech Pty Ltd,
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf, 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
P +61 2 8099 9000, M +61 419 142 254, W www.jirotech.com
P +61 2 8099 9000, M +61 419 142 254, W www.jirotech.com
More information about the Board
mailing list