[Board] pygeoapi logo funding

[Jody Garnett]

Yeah that wiki page is basically a draft, for a more complete picture see
the website <https://www.osgeo.org/about/committees/incubation/> or recent
presentation
<https://www.slideshare.net/jgarnett/open-source-practice-and-passion-at-osgeo>
.

Indeed towards the end of the page you can see "stages" which are left over
from when the idea was called OSGeo Labs :)

I suspect we need an incubation work party to clean up our wiki pages and
update our documents.
--
Jody Garnett


On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 at 10:59, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Thanks Jody.  So then the board governs the community project budget prpoer
> with motion/votes)?  What do others think?  We probably need to update [1]
> as a result.
>
> Having said this, what do we do with the current motion per this email
> thread?
> We are discussing how community project funding can be put forth but we
> have
> a current ask which has gone through incubation committee.
>
> ..Tom
>
> [1]
> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Community_Projects#How_OSGeo_Community_Projects_Are_Related_To_OSGeo_Incubation
>
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2019, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 18:35:57 -0700
> > From: Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
> > To: Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
> > Cc: osgeo-board List <board at lists.osgeo.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Board] pygeoapi logo funding
> >
> > I think it makes sense that incubation committee helps evaluate
> > projects (for website, community, incubation) as our members are
> primarily
> > mentors for open source development teams and are a good position to
> offer
> > advise and guidance.
> >
> > For the larger picture osgeo community program was setup by the board
> > foster innovation and accept more projects into OSGeo.  I think any
> budget
> > associated with osgeo community program should be allocated by the board
> > with these goals in mind. I do not see a reason for the
> > incubation committee to be involved.
> > --
> > Jody Garnett
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 13:45, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> (disclaimer: I am an incubation committee member as well as pygeoapi
> >> founder/dev)
> >>
> >> Having said this, it sounds like workflow is/could be incubation
> >> committee approves
> >> and then board approves?
> >>
> >> Should we add as an agenda item to the next meeting so as to discuss?
> >>
> >> ..Tom
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 1:02 PM Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The incubation committee recently got a request to cover the €34 for
> the
> >> new pygeoapi logo, while we have completed a motion to support this here
> >> --- I feel I need to pass this request over to the board (as keeper of
> the
> >> community project budget).
> >>>
> >>> I hope next year we can be a bit more clear on how community projects
> >> are managed.
> >>>
> >>> On a related note none of the incubation projects have made an
> >> application for funding in 2019. We have seen a number of projects (PROJ
> >> and CITE Team Engine) make considerable progress this year.
> >>> --
> >>> Jody Garnett
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Board mailing list
> >>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
> >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20190910/144ba750/attachment.htm>