[COC-discuss] Classification framework

Wed Oct 21 08:10:11 PDT 2015

Here's the list of everyone on this list:

   1. Seven (aka Arnulf Christl)
   2. Rob Emanuele
   3. Camille E .Acey
   4. Kristin Bott
   5. Cameron Shorter
   6. Sanghee Shin
   7. Jeff McKenna
   8. Jáchym Čepický
   9. David Bitner
   10. Daniel Nüst
   11. Dan "Ducky" Little
   12. Nicolas Bozon
   13. lists+s1560n5223069h39 at n6.nabble.com

There have been no discussions on the private list. The private list is
reserved for addressing actual violations and we still need a few more
volunteers to join (Cameron I know you expressed interest but we wanted to
announce it a few times to make sure we heard back from everyone who was
interested. We'll get back to you soon).

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Sanghee Shin <shshin at gaia3d.com> wrote:

> Hello Cameron,
>
> I’m also here as a lurker.
>
> regards,
>
> 신상희
> ---
> Shin, Sanghee
> Gaia3D, Inc. - The GeoSpatial Company
> http://www.gaia3d.com
>
> 2015. 10. 21., 오전 11:41, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com> 작성:
>
> Hi Camille,
> +1 from me for your suggestions too.
>
> I'm interested to know who is subscribed to this list? It feels a bit
> silly writing to a list that doesn't have anyone listening on the other
> end. If you are watching I suggest speaking up and introducing yourself.
> Has there been discussions on a private list that I'm unaware of?
>
> Camille, if you are a list admin, would you mind letting us know how many
> people are subscribed to the list.
>
> Warm regards, Cameron
>
> On 21/10/2015 1:34 pm, Camille Acey wrote:
>
> Thanks, Rob!
>
> If you know of any other resources or have any recent/relevant forum or
> OSGeo experience that would inform these two tasks that'd be great!
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Rob Emanuele <rdemanuele at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Chiming in just to say, +1 on those two suggested next steps.
>>
>> I'm not sure if anyone would take issue with using Google forms as
>> opposed to an open source reporting system run on OSGeo infrastructure
>> (given the recent discussions on OSGeo-Discuss about code hosting), but I
>> think that the ease of use for Google forms would make it a great choice.
>>
>> The article on enforcement is very thorough, and I think it provides a
>> good method to approach enforcement in a reasoned and de-escalating way.
>> The line "Generally conference staff are not equipped for evidence
>> gathering: we suggest not going around and "interviewing" others involved."
>> The enforcers are not detectives or the police, and it makes sense that the
>> sole focus of any actions would be "*the safety of your community
>> members from harassment*".
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>> Thanks, Cameron.
>>
>> We are not looking to make any changes to the CoC at this point. Our job
>> is to:
>>
>>
>>    1. put together process around how members can submit reports of CoC
>>    violations
>>    2. create specific guidance for LOCs, moderators and the board about
>>    how to deal with those reports and reporters.
>>
>> We put together a list of places to start here -
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/CodeofConduct_Documents#Resources
>>
>> I suggest we:
>>
>>    1. use this form as a starting point for Task #1 -
>>    https://www.drupal.org/governance/community-working-group/incident-report
>>    (not sure if its ok to use Google Forms, that's what drupal.org uses)
>>    2. start an Enforcement page (useful info here
>>    <http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Responding_to_reports>
>>    http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Conference_anti-harassment/Responding_to_reports
>>    )
>>
>> What do you think? Is anyone else out there? if so, please chime in!
>>
>> Camille
>> On Oct 16, 2015 6:57 PM, "Cameron Shorter" <cameron.shorter at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I've drafted a suggested amendment to our CoC to help us answer the
>>> question of what is/is not in scope of a CoC breach.
>>>
>>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Code_Of_Conduct#Classification_Context
>>>
>>> Classification Context
>>> This additional section proposed for version 2.0:
>>> As guidance, content should align with a film classification of: 12+ or
>>> PG or similar. There are many country classifications
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_content_rating_systems>. To
>>> remove ambiguity, we refer to the Australian PG Classification
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Classification_Board#Film_and_video_game_classifications>
>>> :
>>>
>>>    - *Parental Guidance (PG)* – Not recommended for viewing or playing
>>>    by people under 15 without guidance from parents or guardians. Contains
>>>    material that young viewers may find confusing or upsetting. The content is
>>>    mild in impact.
>>>       - *Violence* should be mild and infrequent, and should be
>>>       presented in "a stylised or theatrical fashion, or in an historical
>>>       context".
>>>       - *Themes* should have a "mild sense of menace or threat" and be
>>>       "discreet"
>>>       - *Frightening or Intense Scenes* should be "mildly frightening"
>>>       and have "low intensity"
>>>       - *Crude Humor* should be "mild" or "low level"
>>>       - *Sex, nudity and drug use* should be mild, infrequent,
>>>       "discreetly implied" and "justified by context".
>>>       - *Coarse language* should be mild and infrequent, and be
>>>       justified by context.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/10/2015 6:38 am, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> One thing I've been pondering since seeing the first few questions about
>>>> CoC being discussed is how to "classify" what is considered a CoC
>>>> breach. I'm yet to see any hard guidelines as to what is/is not
>>>> acceptable. (And this sucks up large amounts of bandwidth on email
>>>> lists).
>>>>
>>>
>>> You did good research on this for FOSS4G CoC so it'd be great if you
>>> could get the ball rolling here!
>>>
>>> Ok, I'll start looking into it.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Looking around for what we can borrow as a standard reference, I wonder
>>>> whether we can borrow from film classifications:
>>>>
>>>> I'm familiar with the Australian classifications (being an Australian
>>>> myself), which are well defined:
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Classification_Board#Film_and_video_game_classifications
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cameron Shorter,
>>> Software and Data Solutions Manager
>>> LISAsoft
>>> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
>>> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>>>
>>> P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> COC-discuss mailing list
>> COC-discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/coc-discuss
>>
>>
>
> --
> Cameron Shorter,
> Software and Data Solutions Manager
> LISAsoft
> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>
> P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099
>
> _______________________________________________
> COC-discuss mailing list
> COC-discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/coc-discuss
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/coc-discuss/attachments/20151021/0c340b3b/attachment-0001.html>