[COG] Repo Names [was] Re: Welcome!

[Chris Holmes]

Awesome, yes - definitely want to have at least a couple people in as
initial reviewers. And then as people submit good PR's we can bring them in
too. Probably makes sense to just do a COG organization level set of
permissions, so people can review changes to the website, the validator,
the spec, etc.

If anyone else is interested and has contributed to / created any COG
tooling let me know and I can get you added.

On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Norman Barker <norman.barker at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Chris,
>
> I think we should have several people who can merge PRs for this repo.
>
> I am happy to volunteer to be an additional reviewer, I am working with
> COGs most of the time.
>
> Norman
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Chris Holmes <cholmes at radiant.earth>
> wrote:
>
>> Awesome, thanks to everyone who introduced themselves. I'm excited that
>> everyone is here and interested in collaborating.
>>
>> So I was going to do a poll to vote for names for the repo, but I think
>> most people don't really care, and I think I agree with James.
>>
>> cogeotiff
>>
>> If anyone has any objections let me know. I just created it on github
>> https://github.com/cogeotiff
>>
>> I'll start moving stuff near the end of today (but can easily make
>> another one if there are objections)
>>
>> I'm thinking:
>>
>> cogeotiff/cog-spec for the spec. Initially just copy the info on
>> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/CloudOptimizedGeoTIFF and evolve from
>> there.
>>
>> And I'll move the website over too and coordinate with Even on the
>> validator.
>>
>> C
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> COG mailing list
>> COG at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/cog
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/cog/attachments/20180608/1a77c72b/attachment-0001.html>