[OSGeo-Conf] Conference policy

[Daniel Ames]

+1 for Dave Patton's request for a definition of "3rd party OSGeo branded
event"

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Dave Patton <davep at confluence.org> wrote:

> On 2008/06/23 11:00 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
>
>> Hello fellow committee members,
>>
>> Regarding the hot topic of third party OSGeo branded events, it's clear
>> that we as a committee have to propose some guidelines for this.  After a
>> few weeks of discussions and giving people time to express their opinions, I
>> think the time has come for the conference committee to act.  The first
>> thing we must do is decide whether the conference committee supports such
>> events.  So, I would ask that all committee members[1] publicly vote FOR
>> (+1) or AGAINST (-1) third party OSGeo branded events.
>>
>
> Don't you first need to define what
> "third party OSGeo branded events" means
> (or what it doesn't mean)?
>
> --
> Dave Patton
> CIS Canadian Information Systems
> Victoria, B.C.
>
> Degree Confluence Project:
> Canadian Coordinator
> Technical Coordinator
> http://www.confluence.org/
>
> OSGeo FOSS4G2007 conference:
> Workshop Committee Chair
> Conference Committee member
> http://www.foss4g2007.org/
>
> Personal website:
> Maps, GPS, etc.
> http://members.shaw.ca/davepatton/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>



-- 
Daniel P. Ames, PhD, PE
Geospatial Software Lab
Department of Geosciences
Idaho State University - Idaho Falls
amesdani at isu.edu
www.hydromap.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20080623/3e5acf21/attachment.html