[OSGeo-Conf] Conference policy
Jeff McKenna
jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
Mon Jun 30 15:15:24 EDT 2008
Ok, even though only 4 of the 15 conference committee members [1]
voted, all four votes were in favor of allowing third party OSGeo
branded events.
With that established, the next step for the OSGeo conference
committee is to finalize a conference policy, that we can then
recommend to the Board. I have combined Frank's recent
recommendations, as well as Markus' recent board meeting notes, into a
new succinct policy page [2]. I now call ALL conference committee
members to vote FOR or AGAINST this policy. Again, since this is not
a specific vote for any specific event there should not be anyone
abstaining. thank you.
[1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Committee
[2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Official_OSGeo_Conference_Policy
-jeff
On 23-Jun-08, at 2:00 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> Hello fellow committee members,
>
> Regarding the hot topic of third party OSGeo branded events, it's
> clear that we as a committee have to propose some guidelines for
> this. After a few weeks of discussions and giving people time to
> express their opinions, I think the time has come for the conference
> committee to act. The first thing we must do is decide whether the
> conference committee supports such events. So, I would ask that all
> committee members[1] publicly vote FOR (+1) or AGAINST (-1) third
> party OSGeo branded events. Note that there should be nobody
> abstaining from voting, as this is not a specific vote for any
> specific event. Our guidelines that we create will reflect the
> results of this vote.
>
More information about the Conference_dev
mailing list