[OSGeo-Conf] Conference policy
Frank Warmerdam
warmerdam at pobox.com
Mon Jun 30 16:19:34 EDT 2008
Jeff McKenna wrote:
> Ok, even though only 4 of the 15 conference committee members [1] voted,
> all four votes were in favor of allowing third party OSGeo branded events.
>
> With that established, the next step for the OSGeo conference committee
> is to finalize a conference policy, that we can then recommend to the
> Board. I have combined Frank's recent recommendations, as well as
> Markus' recent board meeting notes, into a new succinct policy page
> [2]. I now call ALL conference committee members to vote FOR or
> AGAINST this policy. Again, since this is not a specific vote for any
> specific event there should not be anyone abstaining. thank you.
>
>
> [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Committee
> [2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Official_OSGeo_Conference_Policy
Jeff,
I'm ok with this policy, but will hold on to my +1 till we have had
some time for discussion.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
More information about the Conference_dev
mailing list