[OSGeo-Conf] Conference policy

Frank Warmerdam warmerdam at pobox.com
Mon Jun 30 16:19:34 EDT 2008


Jeff McKenna wrote:
> Ok, even though only 4 of the 15 conference committee members [1] voted, 
> all four votes were in favor of allowing third party OSGeo branded events.
> 
> With that established, the next step for the OSGeo conference committee 
> is to finalize a conference policy, that we can then recommend to the 
> Board.   I have combined Frank's recent recommendations, as well as 
> Markus' recent board meeting notes, into a new succinct policy page 
> [2].   I now call ALL conference committee members to vote FOR or 
> AGAINST this policy.  Again, since this is not a specific vote for any 
> specific event there should not be anyone abstaining.  thank you.
> 
> 
> [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Committee
> [2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Official_OSGeo_Conference_Policy

Jeff,

I'm ok with this policy, but will hold on to my +1 till we have had
some time for discussion.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org



More information about the Conference_dev mailing list