[OSGeo-Conf] usage of "FOSS4G"

[Frank Warmerdam]

Jason Birch wrote:
> That's understood, but I don't think that FOSS4G is widely used in a
> conference context other than for "the" FOSS4G event, so I think (IANAL)
> that we would probably have a protectable brand in this context.
> 
> If that's the case, we have to make a choice.  If we care whether other
> conferences use the FOSS4G brand, then we need to exert Trademark
> rights, and then deal with all the crap that entails (enforcement, etc).
> If we don't care whether other conferences call themselves FOSS4G, or
> use the FOSS4G brand for portions of their conferences then we don't
> have to do anything.
> 
> I don't think we have much to worry about, just want to make sure that
> we're aware of the choice we're making my choosing not to protect the
> FOSS4G conference brand.

Jason,

OK, I agree.

It is my opinion that we should not attempt to pursue trademark protection
for use of FOSS4G in the conference context, but should politely encourage
others to avoid undue confusion with the OSGeo FOSS4G annual conference
series.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent