[OSGeo-Conf] Do we want to cap size?
Peter Batty
peter.batty at gmail.com
Thu Jun 3 09:53:19 EDT 2010
I agree. I would also probably rather see us have ~1000 people in a
venue for 1200 than in a venue for 3000, I think it's likely to have a
better atmosphere. I don't think we necessarily rule out the larger
venues yet, cost isn't the only factor, so let's look at the
candidates and see what we think.
Cheers,
Peter.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2010, at 7:40 AM, Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com> wrote:
>
>>> Eric Wolf wrote:
>>>> The folks at GITA pointed out that the larger venues cost more
>>>> per person. What this means is if we need capacity for 2000
>>>> people, we basically have just two choices of venues in Denver
>>>> that are both more expensive than if we cap attendance and use a
>>>> smaller venue.
>>>> Do we want to consider capping the number of attendees for FOSS4G
>>>> 2011? This can potentially save a great deal of money if
>>>> attendance isn't at the projected levels. If we cap attendance at
>>>> 1200 people, it opens up three more potential venues.
>>>> Unfortunately, this is a decision that needs to be made before
>>>> FOSS4G 2010 in Barcelona.
>
> Eric,
>
> My opinion is that 1200 is quite a reasonable cap. While there
> might be
> some small chance we could exceed this number, I rather go for the
> mid-sized
> venue and keep costs and complexity more managable.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> ---------------------------------------
> +--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for
> Rent
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
More information about the Conference_dev
mailing list