[OSGeo-Conf] name of the game (conference-cee)

[Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo)]

I can see both positions too but it might help to keep the OSGeo mission in mind.  While there may also be some nostalgic reasons to only allow one larger event, I'm of the belief that we should instead be considering how to best support and outreach to users in all communities.  Clearly, if there is demand somewhere then why would you not want to help meet it?  Especially if it takes advantage of more distributed sets of organisers through local chapters, etc.

Re-debating the issue regularly may be fine for a community discussion, but repeatedly trying to change the goal posts will only frustrate those who want to do something to help.  I think Frank summed up the historical perspective well early in the discussion and I believe that less restriction means more freedom, more buzz and more outreach potential as per the mission.

My two cents,
Tyler



----- Original message -----
> I am not sure those voting now realize the impact of the name in this
> case.
> 
> Yes I am aware of the OSGeo-JP history with the FOSS4G name.
> 
> If FOSS4G-NorthAmerica and FOSS4G-Europe move forward, this will mark 
> the end of the FOSS4G annual event (that I've put almost 10 years of my 
> life into).   There will be no more meeting of the tribe.
> 
> -jeff
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20111006/c4e77417/attachment.html