[OSGeo-Conf] [Board] FOSS4G 2013 wrap up in London - notes

[Steven Feldman]

> From: Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Board] FOSS4G 2013 wrap up in London - notes
> Date: 24 November 2013 14:23:56 GMT
> To: board at lists.osgeo.org, Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>
> Cc: Anne Ghisla <a.ghisla at gmail.com>
> 
> Jeff
> 
> It would be great if you could insert your Board comments and reflections into our wiki page. Feel free to either insert a subsection with your perspectives in each section or to write one section for everything.
> 
> I am happy to schedule a conference call with the board and some of the LOC as well if you wish
> ______
> Steven
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Board] FOSS4G 2013 wrap up in London - notes
>> Date: 22 November 2013 17:42:00 GMT
>> To: board at lists.osgeo.org
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks Anne, wow a great page to analyze.  I feel also the need to do
>> this from the Board perspective (much feedback has been relayed to me
>> on the Nottingham event by community members, and I have been keeping
>> it in wondering when to relay).  Or I wonder if I should be placing
>> these in the lessons learned wiki page?  Or in a conference call
>> between the Nottingham LOC and the Board?  Not sure.
>> 
>> -jeff
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 2013-11-22 1:26 PM, Anne Ghisla wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>> 
>>> on Wednesday we held the FOSS4G wrap up meeting, with the presence 
>>> of Steven, Barry, Barend, Abigail, Claire, Matt, Jo, Jeremy and 
>>> myself. We had a morning of open discussions, that we subsequently 
>>> wrote down in this page: 
>>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G2013_Reflections_by_the_LOC (over 
>>> 100 commits made today!)
>>> 
>>> This set of considerations will be helpful first to FOSS4G 2014 
>>> organisers, even if several of them will not apply because of 
>>> conference organisation outsourcing. I hope that FOSS4G* events 
>>> organisers will find them insightful.
>>> 
>>> Specific notes for the Board ask for more precise requests in the 
>>> RfP, especially on pricing, and for explicit support to the LOC 
>>> when such discussions arise on the public lists. I plan to expand 
>>> this page http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Rfp
>>> 
>>> and bring it to next Board meeting and/or to relevant committees.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> Anne
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Board mailing list
>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20131124/e5915797/attachment.html>