[OSGeo-Conf] FOSS4G 2016 and 2017 and 2018 Call for Hosting

Eli Adam eadam at co.lincoln.or.us
Mon Dec 22 13:38:30 PST 2014


On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Cameron Shorter
<cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm +0 for moving the conference selection forward.
> I suggest start by selecting foss4g-na in 6 months time, foss4g-(elsewhere)
> in 12 months.
> If that suites people from NA, I suggest raising a motion.

Selecting FOSS4G 2017 12 months from now would be keeping things about
the same, I don't think a motion is needed to do that.

Eli

>
>
> On 23/12/2014 4:13 am, Eli Adam wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Fair points Arnulf
>>>
>>> Surely the announcement requesting LoI’s can be anticipated by potential
>>> bid
>>> teams who can start their venue planning etc before the official
>>> announcement.
>>
>> Writing LoI's is easy and can be done years in advance or the week in
>> advance.  Reserving venues with a deposit is more of a commitment.
>>
>>> We know 2016 is Europe, 2017 is America, 2018 is somewhere else 2019 is
>>> Europe, 2020 America and 2012 is somewhere else - do teams bidding for
>>> 2017
>>> onwards need any more notification than that?
>>
>> Yes, LOCs need a decision so that they can pay a deposit on their
>> venue.  Most venues will not reserve without a deposit and most LOCs
>> won't pay a deposit without a decision that they have been awarded the
>> bid.
>>
>> Where is PyCon in 2017?  Oh, Portland [1], they already know far in
>> advance and will be reserving venues, the same venues that FOSS4G
>> might be considering.  Same for other cities and other conferences.
>> The conferences that book the same venues as FOSS4G reserve 2-3 years
>> in advance, for FOSS4G to have a chance at those venues we need to
>> reserve on similar time frames (or rely on luck or alternate venues or
>> adjust the dates).
>>
>>
>> Best regards, Eli
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2014/08/portland-chosen-as-pycon-20162017.html
>>
>>
>>> ______
>>> Steven
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19 Dec 2014, at 11:52, Seven (aka Arnulf) <seven at arnulf.us> wrote:
>>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Steven,
>>> in my experience there are several distinct phases and the very initial
>>> phase of selecting a venue, coordinating with parallel events, starting
>>> dialogs about co-location etc. need to be done with enough time to go.
>>> This will typically be done by a small team of initial firestarters.
>>>
>>> Later on the team will grow and include others. The last sprint planning
>>> meeting will take place just a few months prior to the conference.
>>>
>>> Therefore I would not think that an early CfP will result in a tired or
>>> burnt-out team. It is the responsibility of the LOC chair to manage
>>> accordingly (as you have brilliantly managed to) and take care that the
>>> team will not be stretched too hard (...until a few weeks prior to the
>>> event when the team has to go full throttle).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Arnulf
>>>
>>> On 19.12.2014 08:33, Steven Feldman wrote:
>>>
>>> I am not sure that I agree that LOCs need or want more than 18-20
>>> months notice. Whilst there may be a benefit in terms of venue
>>> booking, there could be a downside in team fatigue and drop out
>>>
>>> For FOSS4G2013 we started thinking about the event and putting a team
>>> together in September 2011. We were ready with a venue (provisional
>>> booking) by the time the call for LoIs came out.
>>>
>>> Steven
>>>
>>> On 19 Dec 2014, at 01:13, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>>>
>>> Conference Committee,
>>>
>>> Consistent feedback from previous LOCs is "make the FOSS4G LOC
>>> decision with more time before the event".  The 2016 decision is
>>> slated to be made on 2015-03-01 [1].  Should we launch the 2017
>>> process on 2015-03-02?  It seems that LOCs are eagerly awaiting
>>> the opportunity to bid and are more than prepared once the process
>>> happens.
>>>
>>> A LOC decision with more time before the event may also be the
>>> single best way to ensure success and reduce risk.  It is also
>>> super easy.  I suggest moving up the 2017 and 2018 timelines.
>>> Until there are complaints from potential LOCs that the decision is
>>> too early or more importantly if there are no quality bids, then I
>>> think the decision can be made sooner.
>>>
>>> Claude, Sorry to hear that there is not suitable date availability
>>> at your top choice venue.  I'm sure that if Lausanne bids it would
>>> be one of several very excellent bids.  Had the bid been earlier
>>> and awarded to Lasanne, I'm sure that the LOC would already be well
>>> on the way to a great conference.
>>>
>>> Best regards, Eli
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.osgeo.org/conference/rfp/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ Conference_dev
>>> mailing list Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - --
>>> Exploring Space, Time and Mind
>>> http://arnulf.us
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>>>
>>> iEYEARECAAYFAlSUEZoACgkQXmFKW+BJ1b3Q4ACeK9zadq5oE4s9IqhUAUm2DZT9
>>> lM8AnRKDuLTKE2mWxymvfYO1ekiMVqiz
>>> =l4Nu
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>
> --
> Cameron Shorter,
> Software and Data Solutions Manager
> LISAsoft
> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>
> P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev


More information about the Conference_dev mailing list