[OSGeo-Conf] Code of Conduct

Wed Jan 14 04:19:38 PST 2015

Hi all, 

Unlike Darrell, I love this kind of discussion. Through this kind of discussion, I feel that I’ve learnt many things from diverse persons who has different point of view on this. I also hope others could learn something from this discussion. That might be power of open discussion. 

I believe the core message of CoC is "Respect other people.” And this core message “Respect" should be delivered also in this discussion. Person who has questions on whether CoC is necessary are not the advocate of evil or other crimes. They are just colleagues and friends who has different view on that. It’s not the problem of enforcing CoC is virtue/right/good and not enforcing CoC is vicious/wrong/bad. Something taken granted for someone is not always taken granted to others.

We’ve just started full discussion on CoC in the list. And that doesn’t mean our community retarded or ignorant one. This is our current status and we just need to start to discuss from this point. That’s all!! We really need to discuss more and more on this to increase & build consensus among members. Putting CoC mandatory without enough discussion or without enough consensus simply because other communities adopted that might be more problematic. 

All the best, 

Sanghee
---
Sanghee Shin, Chair of FOSS4G 2015 Seoul 
"Toward Diversity! FOSS4G Bigbang from Seoul!"
http://2015.foss4g.org
Twitter: @foss4g
Facebook: FOSS4G2015
email: foss4gchair at osgeo.org

> 2015. 1. 14., 오후 12:22, Darrell Fuhriman <darrell at garnix.org> 작성:
> 
> I agree with Kate here, and want to emphasize this line:
> 
> "Conferences where bad things happen and there is not a clear plan often do not fair so well.”
> 
> It’s really great to say “can’t we just assume everyone will be nice.”  The answer is “no”. We can assume that *nearly* everyone will be, but occasionally things happen, most of them minor, some of them genuinely awful.
> 
> 
> A CoC isn’t a feel good statement. It’s a public commitment to providing a safe and welcoming environment to all members of the community. Are you afraid of that commitment?
> 
> To be honest, I’m a lot baffled, and a more than a little annoyed that we’re even having this conversation. That conferences need a CoC and a plan to enforce it should be taken for granted at this point. Really. I’m not going to have the discussion here. It’s been had in a thousand forums already. CoCs won. Accept it and plan for it.
> 
> Examples:
> 
> All O’Reilly Conferences: http://www.oreilly.com/conferences/code-of-conduct.html <http://www.oreilly.com/conferences/code-of-conduct.html>
> ApacheCon NA: http://gi106.gondor.co/code_of_conduct/ <http://gi106.gondor.co/code_of_conduct/>
> PyCon: https://us.pycon.org/2013/about/code-of-conduct/ <https://us.pycon.org/2013/about/code-of-conduct/>
> State of the Map US: http://stateofthemap.us/2014/codeofconduct/ <http://stateofthemap.us/2014/codeofconduct/>
> EclipseCon: https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/news/code-conduct <https://www.eclipsecon.org/na2014/news/code-conduct>
> LinuxConf: http://linux.conf.au/cor/code_of_conduct <http://linux.conf.au/cor/code_of_conduct>
> 
> Shall I go on?
> 
> So my questions to the people who question whether a CoC is necessary: 
> 
> What if something genuinely awful happens? What will you do? 
> What about something kind of bad? How will you recognize that, and how will you handle it? Who will do it?
> How do you know what’s genuinely awful and what’s “kind of bad”? 
> 
> These aren’t idle questions. these are exactly the kind of things that you have to plan for. Do you have answers for them?
> 
> Darrell
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 11, 2015, at 19:41, Kate Chapman <kate at maploser.com <mailto:kate at maploser.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> There are people that have pledged not to attend conferences without a code of conduct. Honestly, I asked for one to be put in place for Nottingham. I would have had to seriously consider if I wanted to keynote at a conference without a code of conduct if the team hadn't understood the need and put one in place. 
>> 
>> We say that things are common sense and people should just follow that, but honestly that isn't enough. It is important to have clear guidelines spelled out. I've been a conferences where there was a code of conduct where incidents did happen, but there was a clear plan to manage them. Conferences where bad things happen and there is not a clear plan often do not fair so well. 
>> 
>> The Ada Initiative has great resources for designing a code of conduct(1). There are also many other open source foundations we could look up to such as the Python Foundation that have codes for their events and have required such since 2012(2). Recently the QGIS community adopted a code of conduct(3), a move which I applaud. 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> -Kate
>> 
>> (1) https://adainitiative.org/2014/02/howto-design-a-code-of-conduct-for-your-community/ <https://adainitiative.org/2014/02/howto-design-a-code-of-conduct-for-your-community/>
>> (2) http://pyfound.blogspot.co.nz/2012/12/psf-moves-to-require-code-of-conduct.html <http://pyfound.blogspot.co.nz/2012/12/psf-moves-to-require-code-of-conduct.html>
>> (3) https://www.qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/codeofconduct/codeofconduct.html <https://www.qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/codeofconduct/codeofconduct.html>
>> 
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com <mailto:jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> I agree with Cameron's points lower. 
>> 
>> I'm also not sure, that the lack of CoC will "lower gender diversity" (do I assume correctly, number of female attendees will be somehow "lower", right?) and that it's presence on the web site automatically means welcoming conference.  
>> 
>> Sanghee is writing it perfectly: " No Discrimination, No Harassment are the baseline morals of our general life to live". He also expresses my feelings, about cultural context difference. We should try to understand everybody's cultural context, that's also one of the reason, why FOSS4G is moving around the globe and we can experience all the various cultural aspects.
>> 
>> From what Sanghee is writing, I have no doubt, LOC will try to make the conference as open and as welcoming to *everybody* as possible.
>> 
>> Anyway: this e-mail is not about "banning CoC for FOSS4Gs", but asking question, whether CoC is really *the* thing, which will safe the conference and guarantee, that everybody will feel great there. Do what you think, is needed.
>> 
>> Jachym
>> 
>> Thu Jan 08 2015 at 21:12:52 odesílatel Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com <mailto:cameron.shorter at gmail.com>> napsal:
>> 
>> David,
>> I'm in favour of a Code Of Conduct, but suggest there should be some tweaking of the words (if using https://2015.foss4g-na.org/code-conduct <https://2015.foss4g-na.org/code-conduct> text)
>> 
>> Reasons:
>> 1. At the moment, I think some wording is a bit loose, and open to misinterpretation between cultures and geographic regions. What does "Sexual images" mean? Is it nudity? Does a photo of a field trip with naked natives constitute a "sexual image"? Is the clique advertisement of a pretty sales girl standing next to a car considered a "Sexual image"? Should we be using a Middle East definition of "Sexual image" or "American" where the norm for acceptable clothes are different? Is wearing a mini-skirt considered acceptable? (I don't have good words to address this, but suspect there would be template material somewhere which could be used).
>> 
>> 2. We should be careful to try and avoid attendees feeling that they are being lectured to, as if organisors expect attendees to be guilty. Maybe start with, "In order to ensure a pleasant experience for everyone, all attendees are *expected to*  ... (instead of *required to* ...)"
>> 
>> David,
>> Once finalised, I suggest adding a section about "Code of Conduct" into: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Handbook <http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Handbook>
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/01/2015 4:28 am, Steven Feldman wrote:
>>> There was also a short CoC for 2013 at http://2013.foss4g.org/code-of-conduct/ <http://2013.foss4g.org/code-of-conduct/> which corresponds to the short version of the 2015 NA CoC
>>> 
>>> David, this is a great initiative. Can we consider mandating a standard (and evolving through experience) CoC for all FOSS4G branded events and any other vents that claim to be affiliated to OSGeo?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ______
>>> Steven
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 8 Jan 2015, at 17:08, David William Bitner <bitner at dbspatial.com <mailto:bitner at dbspatial.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Great! Thanks Sanghee!
>>>> 
>>>> Has your team considered adding a code of conduct to your website? 
>>>> 
>>>> The past two FOSS4G global events have included CoC's on the website as well as asking registrants to agree to the CoC by a checkbox on the registration form.
>>>> 
>>>> https://2014.foss4g.org/attending/code-of-conduct/ <https://2014.foss4g.org/attending/code-of-conduct/> and https://2015.foss4g-na.org/code-conduct <https://2015.foss4g-na.org/code-conduct> are some examples that have been used.
>>>> 
>>>> We have received a lot of positive response from attendees since adding these to the conferences and have certainly seen an impact in gender diversity since incorporating CoC's into our websites along with other outreach and diversity initiatives. It is a very easy step towards ensuring that everyone is assured of the expectation of a welcoming conference! I am sure that other past conference chairs on this list can speak up to their experiences as well.
>>>> 
>>>> I hope all is going well with planning for the event!
>>>> 
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> 
>>>> David
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Sanghee Shin <endofcap at gmail.com <mailto:endofcap at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> Hi David, 
>>>> 
>>>> I’m on the list. You can talk to me directly. 
>>>> 
>>>> With regards, 
>>>> 
>>>> Sanghee
>>>> ---
>>>> Sanghee Shin, Chair of FOSS4G 2015 Seoul 
>>>> "Toward Diversity! FOSS4G Bigbang from Seoul!"
>>>> http://2015.foss4g.org <http://2015.foss4g.org/>
>>>> Twitter: @foss4g
>>>> Facebook: FOSS4G2015
>>>> email: foss4gchair at osgeo.org <mailto:foss4gchair at osgeo.org>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 2015. 1. 8., 오후 4:22, David William Bitner <bitner at dbspatial.com <mailto:bitner at dbspatial.com>> 작성:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear Conference Committee,
>>>>> 
>>>>> It has recently been brought to my attention by a member of our community that she noticed the absence of a Code of Conduct for the upcoming Seoul FOSS4G. I took this as a huge sign that the work that has been done by LOCs in recent FOSS4G, regional OSGeo events, and other technology and geography events towards encouraging diversity and a welcoming atmosphere to all is indeed being noticed. I have also been excited to see based simply on the measure of gender diversity that the numbers of female speakers has been steadily moving up over the past couple years.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would like to encourage the Conference Committee (and I am volunteering to do much of the leg work) to provide guidelines for implementing a Code of Conduct at events for all FOSS4G/OSGeo related events and to include diversity initiatives as part of future calls for proposals for the international event.
>>>>> 
>>>>> While I believe it is too late for the conference committee to make any mandates to the Seoul team, is there anyone who knows the folks on the LOC that would be willing to help me reach out to explain the importance of these initiatives?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> 
>>>>> David
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> ************************************
>>>>> David William Bitner
>>>>> dbSpatial LLC
>>>>> 612-424-9932 <tel:612-424-9932>_______________________________________________
>>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> ************************************
>>>> David William Bitner
>>>> dbSpatial LLC
>>>> 612-424-9932 <tel:612-424-9932>_______________________________________________
>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev>
>> -- 
>> Cameron Shorter,
>> Software and Data Solutions Manager
>> LISAsoft
>> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
>> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>> 
>> P +61 2 9009 5000 <tel:%2B61%202%209009%205000>,  W www.lisasoft.com <http://www.lisasoft.com/>,  F +61 2 9009 5099 <tel:%2B61%202%209009%205099>_______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20150114/d3a44bf0/attachment-0001.html>