[OSGeo-Conf] Question Period: Workshops
Jeff McKenna
jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
Sun Mar 1 15:38:16 PST 2015
This concept of additional sessions with bring-your-own-device was
introduced a few years ago (some call it 'labs' instead of workshops).
Workshops (with a provided workstation) are possibly one of the most
important parts of what makes a FOSS4G event. Workshop instructors are
given a choice of using a live-DVD or virtual machine, or pre-installing
software on the workshop system.
In my opinion (and yes until 2013 I was involved in each and every
workshop committee at every FOSS4G event right back to 2004, the only
one consistent member of FOSS4G organizing, so I do have a say in this)
workshops are mandatory for FOSS4G local committees to include, whereas
'labs' are not required/extra. I would not even class it as a
'suggestion', I would class labs as 'optional'. [note that I believe the
Bonn team has proposed using additional 'lab' sessions]
For workshops, I also don't think we should get away from providing a
workstation. But using a virtual machine or liveDVD has become a great
option for workshop presenters, and OSGeo-Live has fit in nicely.
Maybe this thread should instead be used in how to prevent workshop
committees from using incorrect OSGeo-Live versions, or improperly
formatted USBs (which I see happen at possibly 80% of workshops at
FOSS4G events, sorry yes it is that high). This is really the need.
In fact there has been a recent suggestion for the OSGeo marketing
committee to handle providing these OSGeo-Live USB devices to all
conference events (use their known supplier, have the OSGeo-Live
developers install and configure, etc.). Makes total sense.
I think that is the future.
-jeff
On 2015-03-01 3:55 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> I'm starting to move away from questions to suggestions.
> It is possible to run workshops under a "bring your own laptop" model.
> We have had reports of people doing this using OSGeo-Live USBs and VMs.
> (Mac users using VMs).
>
> Pros:
>
> * It reduces setup requirements
> * It reduces cost of labs and requirements for having lots of computers
> * It reduces need to locate labs, which are often at a different
> location to conference venue
>
> Cons:
>
> * You are tied to an OSGeo-Live distribution (or you face a time
> consuming task of creating your own distribution)
> * Some users might not be technically savvy enough to set up their
> computer. (This can be mitigated by encouraging students to pair up).
> * Some of your workshop time will need to be spend explaining how to
> start a VM / OSGeo-Live.
>
More information about the Conference_dev
mailing list