[OSGeo-Conf] RFP tweaks

[Darrell Fuhriman]

I don't see the need to have an intermediary either. By the time we get to the submission point all the real work has been done. 

d. 

> On Dec 28, 2016, at 08:24, Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Eli is correct. When we were revising the RfP process, I suggested proposals were sent to the CC chair rather than posted directly to the list, this was based on the concerns that Michael had previously expressed.
> 
> I am relieved that Eli persuaded me otherwise (the person steering the selection process has enough work to do without picking up this additional task). I tend to agree with Eli’s reasons for not implementing the suggested change but I would like to hear whether any other LOC’s over the last few years have any concerns in this regard