[OSGeo-Conf] [Board] FOSS4G 2017 contracting & funding
Steven Feldman
shfeldman at gmail.com
Thu Mar 3 15:20:53 PST 2016
I propose a motion:
The conference committee approves the request from the Boston LOC for an advance of up to $70,000 to be phased $20,000 by end March 2016 and up to $50,000 during Q4 2016 and recommends to the OSGeo Board accordingly.
This approval is subject to the BLOC and/or their PCO signing an agreement with OSGeo
Voting should close at 18.00 GMT on Monday 7th March
+1 from me
______
Steven
> On 3 Mar 2016, at 23:15, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael and the BLOC,
>
> I haven't yet reviewed the documents in detail. Other comments in line below.
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Conference Committee colleagues
>>
>> Can we agree that we will give Michael the ‘green light’ if there have been
>> no objections raised by close of business on Monday 7th? We will then need
>> to make a recommendation to the Board, I can do this on behalf of the CC if
>> you are agreeable.
>
> This sounds good to me, also note the Board meeting schedule and agenda.
>
>>
>> Cheers
>> ______
>> Steven
>>
>>
>> On 3 Mar 2016, at 20:33, Michael Terner <mgt at appgeo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Steven, Cameron, Peter & the rest of the Conference Dev:
>> Thank you for the prompt reply to my queries from this morning. Glad to see
>> that we're on track, and the link to the template doc is very helpful and
>> we'll get that in front of our PCO today.
>>
>> Also, to Steven's question on the advance. As per an earlier thread, we are
>> thinking we'd ask for two advances. This initial one - for $20k US - to get
>> us up and rolling in "quiet mode" through the completion of the 2016 North
>> American (Raleigh) and Global (Bonn) events; and then a second advance in
>> September, 2016 that will help us pay necessary deposits and keep the cash
>> flow until registrations and sponsorship revenues hit their stride, likely
>> in the Feb/March timeframe of 2017. We expect the second advance to be on
>> the order of $40-50k US.
>
> I suggest only asking the Board for one advance. In past years this
> has been $50k US or 50k Euros. If the Board asks to space it out over
> time, that is up to them but I see no reason for you to do that.
>
>>
>> We'll await any further input from Conference Dev through tomorrow (as per
>> my proposed timeline), and then we'll move to complete the agreement and
>> initiate approvals with the Board early next week.
>
> Coordination with the Board meeting schedule can be important, as well
> as getting on their agenda,
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_of_Directors#Meetings. You can work
> with Steven to coordinate that.
>
> In past years, the Board portion has been done by the president and/or
> treasurer.
>
> Best regards, Eli
>
>>
>> Thanks again, as you can likely tell we are eager to continue momentum and
>> build speed...
>>
>> MT & the BLOC
>>
>> PS: If you're interested, our logo competition is in full swing and there
>> are some great submittals that you can check out here.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Peter Batty <peter at ebatty.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am +1 also, with similar caveats to Cameron - haven't had a chance to
>>> review the contracts, but am fine with the general principles outlined here.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Cameron Shorter
>>> <cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I back Steven's statement.
>>>> It sounds reasonable and I trust his experience and judgement.
>>>>
>>>> I won't have time to do any more than the very precursory review I've
>>>> done, so +1 from me based on Steven's feedback.
>>>>
>>>> Cameron
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/03/2016 2:29 am, Steven Feldman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Apologies for the delay, I have been away.
>>>>
>>>> This all looks in order to me. Do you anticipate that you will need
>>>> further funds from OSGeo before your sponsorship income starts to come in?
>>>> If so how much and when?
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully several others on the CC will chip in and agree.
>>>>
>>>> Next steps (as see them) after ratification by CC are:
>>>>
>>>> Complete an agreement between OSGeo and your PCO - the template doc is at
>>>> https://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/2016/financial_stuff/agreement_with_osgeo/
>>>> Recommend to board
>>>> board signs off and transfers funds
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> ______
>>>> Steven
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28 Feb 2016, at 18:46, Michael Terner <mgt at appgeo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Apologies that this took more time than the 2 weeks that was estimated
>>>> earlier, but I believe the BLOC is now in a position to fully follow the
>>>> Conference Dev Committee's recommendations on next steps (as documented
>>>> earlier in this thread). Attached you will find two documents:
>>>>
>>>> Draft contract from Delaney Meeting and Management (DMM) to be our PCO
>>>> and under contract to OSGeo on behalf of the BLOC
>>>> Draft "financial plan" that shows the anticipated scheduling of spending
>>>> across the 6+ quarters that remain before Aug, 2017
>>>>
>>>> Please confirm that this provides the information that you need to assess
>>>> our planning and move forward towards providing a signed PCO contract and an
>>>> advance. As per earlier advice, and a review of the spending plan, we would
>>>> like to recalibrate and ask that our initial advance be in the sum of
>>>> $20,000 US (instead of the $10,000 figure we used earlier in this thread).
>>>>
>>>> A quick note on the nature of the DMM contract. This contract is
>>>> consciously structured as a time and materials (T&M) engagement with a "not
>>>> to exceed" figure. The DMM contract provides an extremely detailed list of
>>>> the tasks that are anticipated and their estimated costs, and this will
>>>> serve as the "menu" for services. We believe that a T&M structure preserves
>>>> maximum flexibility so that un-needed tasks (or tasks our BLOC can complete)
>>>> may be removed, and so that new, or altered tasks can be added as needed.
>>>> Also, please note that the PCO figure used in the spending plan includes
>>>> approximately $6,000 of direct expenses incurred by the PCO.
>>>>
>>>> We would respectfully ask for a quick review as we have a significant,
>>>> near-term milestone, to sign an agreement with our chosen venue, the Boston
>>>> World Trade Center conference facility and the Seaport hotel. To secure our
>>>> dates, we really need to lock this down in March; hopefully by the middle of
>>>> the month. Having an OSGeo contract with our PCO is a precursor to the venue
>>>> agreement.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the potential timeline we foresee:
>>>>
>>>> February 29: Conference Dev now has our draft PCO contract w/ DMM and a
>>>> draft spending plan for review
>>>> March 4: Receive feedback on contract and spending plan
>>>> March 8: Iterate with Conference Dev on contract and spending plan and
>>>> bring all issues (if any) to mutually agreeable closure
>>>> March 15: Receive appropriate approvals so that OSGeo can sign the
>>>> contract with DMM which will enable them to act as our financial agent
>>>> March 18: Have DMM enter into agreement with the World Trade
>>>> Center/Seaport Hotel on behalf of OSGeo/BLOC
>>>> March 31: Once the agreements are in place, the BLOC will work with
>>>> Conference Dev and the Board to secure an initial advance in the sum of
>>>> $20,000 US.
>>>>
>>>> Does this make sense? If not, please advise with any questions so that we
>>>> can keep this moving.
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks and all the best...
>>>>
>>>> MT
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 to things that Steven and Cameron have said.
>>>>>
>>>>> On the 10k advance, make sure it is enough, you don't want to have to
>>>>> ask for more before the planned larger advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards, Eli
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Spot on Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look forward to reviewing the PCO contract and your financial plan
>>>>>> when you
>>>>>> are ready.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Personally I like the idea of splitting the financial request in 2
>>>>>> tranches
>>>>>> as you have outlined. Good idea
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> ______
>>>>>> Steven
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27 Jan 2016, at 03:08, Michael Terner <mgt at appgeo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cameron & Steven:
>>>>>> Once again thanks for the good advice and careful guidance. Here's
>>>>>> where we
>>>>>> stand:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have a proposal from our POC that outlines their scope/duties and
>>>>>> we are
>>>>>> completing our review. I have asked them for their "contract" language
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> wraps the scope. We anticipate completing our review and providing
>>>>>> those to
>>>>>> you (i.e., Conf Comm) early next week.
>>>>>> We have now reviewed, and understand the Wiki postings on the
>>>>>> guarantees,
>>>>>> and we will commence with a more detailed financial plan.
>>>>>> We anticipate potentially seeking two advances:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the short term, something on the order of $10k (US) for:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Startup activities with our PCO
>>>>>> Development of promotional materials (e.g., video, logo, sponsor
>>>>>> prospectus,
>>>>>> etc.) so we are ready to go once Bonn completes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the medium term, likely just after Bonn, when OSGeo finances are
>>>>>> clearer;
>>>>>> something on the order of what was provided to Bonn, i.e., $50k (US)
>>>>>> for:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Payment of deposits
>>>>>> Further support from our PCO
>>>>>> Cashflow pending sponsorship and registration revenues
>>>>>> Marketing and messaging
>>>>>> Sponsorship recruitment
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope this gives you a better sense of where we're coming from and we
>>>>>> will
>>>>>> move aggressively this week and next to have contract materials to the
>>>>>> Conf
>>>>>> Comm for review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks again...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MT
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Cameron Shorter
>>>>>> <cameron.shorter at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm dropping the OSGeo-Board off the CC list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 to all Steven said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You will often find that if someone gives you good advise from an
>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>> list, then others on the list won't feel a need to chime in. In this
>>>>>>> case,
>>>>>>> if you don't get someone extending or contradicting Steven's advice
>>>>>>> within
>>>>>>> 48 hours, then it is probably worth following.
>>>>>>> For major decision points which the list members will help identify,
>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>> as committing to spending, we will put a motion to the vote, and
>>>>>>> likely
>>>>>>> escalate to the board to confirm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers, Cameron
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 26/01/2016 12:29 am, Steven Feldman wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My answers (just one member of the ConfCttee though)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I suggest you obtain a draft agreement between your PCO and OSGeo,
>>>>>>> send it
>>>>>>> to the CC and we will review it and then either suggest changes or
>>>>>>> forward
>>>>>>> to the board with a recommendation.
>>>>>>> With regard to an advance please note the type of guarantees from the
>>>>>>> LOC
>>>>>>> or PCO to that are outlined in the wiki at
>>>>>>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Handbook#Guarantees. The actual
>>>>>>> agreement
>>>>>>> with 2016 is at
>>>>>>> https://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/2016/budget_planning/ .
>>>>>>> Could you give an indication of what the advance is required for?
>>>>>>> I would suggest that you send requests to the ConfCttee and we can
>>>>>>> decide
>>>>>>> if the matter needs board consideration
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great to see you guys getting stuck in so early
>>>>>>> ______
>>>>>>> Steven
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 25 Jan 2016, at 12:33, Michael Terner <mgt at appgeo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cameron et al:
>>>>>>> Thank you very much for the careful guidance and the lesson on how to
>>>>>>> communicate going forward. Obviously, we're feeling our way into this
>>>>>>> realm
>>>>>>> but you will find us eager students and quick learners. Please keep
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> guidance coming. As such, see below for our re-factored "concise
>>>>>>> questions",
>>>>>>> and a request for clarification on one ambiguity:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Immediate questions from the BLOC on needs/next steps:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since our LOC is not incorporated, we would like to proceed with the
>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>> model that Cameron described he followed in 2009 with "OSGeo (being)
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> legal body which engaged with the PCO." What should we do, and with
>>>>>>> whom, to
>>>>>>> initiate this process?
>>>>>>> Can the BLOC obtain a $10,000(US) advance to fund startup costs,
>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>> with our PCO, to cover the period from February - August? What should
>>>>>>> we do,
>>>>>>> and with whom, to initiate this process?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Request for clarification:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Heard, understood and acknowledged regarding aiming messages at the
>>>>>>> Conference Dev mailing list. Should we do this exclusively on opening
>>>>>>> salvos
>>>>>>> of requests? Or, should we also CC the Board? In other words, is it
>>>>>>> up to
>>>>>>> the Conference Dev list to decide when something needs to be elevated
>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>> board?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks again...We're looking forward to moving into the activation
>>>>>>> phase
>>>>>>> of this odyssey.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> MT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Cameron Shorter
>>>>>>> <cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>>>>>> For conference related questions, I suggest your first point of call
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> the conference email list (CCed), which contains past foss4g
>>>>>>>> leaders.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (This is how OSGeo was set up to work when things are working
>>>>>>>> smoothly.
>>>>>>>> Committees are where most decisions are made, and the board is only
>>>>>>>> called
>>>>>>>> in to validate important decisions.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For this email thread, I suggest being more specific in your
>>>>>>>> question. If
>>>>>>>> you know what you want, suggest it.
>>>>>>>> "I'm thinking we should do XXX, can you please confirm this is ok."
>>>>>>>> "We have selected our PCO, and we now need to set up a contract. We
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> a contract needing reviewing / We need to draft a contract / Are
>>>>>>>> there any
>>>>>>>> prior contracts we can look at to use as a basis of our contract /
>>>>>>>> ..."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You will find concise questions are much easier to answer, and hence
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> are more likely to get a response.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In part answer to your question, there have been a number of
>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>> engagement models for FOSS4G over the years.
>>>>>>>> In 2009, which I was involved in, the LOC was not incorporated, and
>>>>>>>> OSGeo
>>>>>>>> was the legal body which engaged with the PCO.
>>>>>>>> In other years I think the LOC directly engaged the PCO.
>>>>>>>> How would the LOC like to proceed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Warm regards, Cameron
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 22/01/2016 4:47 am, Michael Terner wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While entirely respecting the ongoing efforts and precedence for
>>>>>>>> both the
>>>>>>>> FOSS4G 2016 even in Bonn and the FOSS4GNA 2016 in Raleigh, NC, the
>>>>>>>> Boston
>>>>>>>> Location Organizing Committee (BLOC) has begun our planning in
>>>>>>>> earnest.
>>>>>>>> Toward that end it is time for us to formally engage with our
>>>>>>>> Professional
>>>>>>>> Conference Organizer (PCO) and to think about contracts. Our
>>>>>>>> understanding
>>>>>>>> is that this generally happens with contracts between OSGeo and the
>>>>>>>> PCO, and
>>>>>>>> then the PCO acting as a financial agent on behalf of OSGeo vis a
>>>>>>>> vis
>>>>>>>> entering into contracts with the venue and other suppliers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> At this stage we are looking for guidance/confirmation on the
>>>>>>>> process and
>>>>>>>> with whom we should engage to get details and start the ball
>>>>>>>> rolling? We
>>>>>>>> also understand that it may be possible to obtain some early advance
>>>>>>>> funding
>>>>>>>> that could support our startup until the Bonn event concludes and we
>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>> accelerate the planning process.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you in advance for your support and guidance...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> MT & the BLOC
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Michael Terner
>>>>>>>> Executive Vice President
>>>>>>>> 617-447-2468 Direct | 617-447-2400 Main
>>>>>>>> Applied Geographics, Inc.
>>>>>>>> 24 School Street, Suite 500
>>>>>>>> Boston, MA 02108
>>>>>>>> www.AppGeo.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or
>>>>>>>> legally privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient
>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>> otherwise authorized to receive this message, you should not use,
>>>>>>>> copy,
>>>>>>>> distribute, disclose or take any action based on the information
>>>>>>>> contained
>>>>>>>> in this e-mail or any attachments. If you have received this message
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> material in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply
>>>>>>>> e-mail and
>>>>>>>> delete this message. Thank you on behalf of Applied Geographics,
>>>>>>>> Inc.
>>>>>>>> (AppGeo).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Board mailing list
>>>>>>>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cameron Shorter,
>>>>>>>> Software and Data Solutions Manager
>>>>>>>> LISAsoft
>>>>>>>> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
>>>>>>>> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> P +61 2 9009 5000, W www.lisasoft.com, F +61 2 9009 5099
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Board mailing list
>>>>>>>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Michael Terner
>>>>>>> Executive Vice President
>>>>>>> 617-447-2468 Direct | 617-447-2400 Main
>>>>>>> Applied Geographics, Inc.
>>>>>>> 24 School Street, Suite 500
>>>>>>> Boston, MA 02108
>>>>>>> www.AppGeo.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or
>>>>>>> legally privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>> otherwise authorized to receive this message, you should not use,
>>>>>>> copy,
>>>>>>> distribute, disclose or take any action based on the information
>>>>>>> contained
>>>>>>> in this e-mail or any attachments. If you have received this message
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> material in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply
>>>>>>> e-mail and
>>>>>>> delete this message. Thank you on behalf of Applied Geographics, Inc.
>>>>>>> (AppGeo)._______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cameron Shorter,
>>>>>>> Software and Data Solutions Manager
>>>>>>> LISAsoft
>>>>>>> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
>>>>>>> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> P +61 2 9009 5000, W www.lisasoft.com, F +61 2 9009 5099
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Michael Terner
>>>>>> Executive Vice President
>>>>>> 617-447-2468 Direct | 617-447-2400 Main
>>>>>> Applied Geographics, Inc.
>>>>>> 24 School Street, Suite 500
>>>>>> Boston, MA 02108
>>>>>> www.AppGeo.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or
>>>>>> legally
>>>>>> privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient or
>>>>>> otherwise
>>>>>> authorized to receive this message, you should not use, copy,
>>>>>> distribute,
>>>>>> disclose or take any action based on the information contained in this
>>>>>> e-mail or any attachments. If you have received this message and
>>>>>> material in
>>>>>> error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> message. Thank you on behalf of Applied Geographics, Inc. (AppGeo).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Terner
>>>> Executive Vice President
>>>> 617-447-2468 Direct | 617-447-2400 Main
>>>> Applied Geographics, Inc.
>>>> 24 School Street, Suite 500
>>>> Boston, MA 02108
>>>> www.AppGeo.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or
>>>> legally privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient or
>>>> otherwise authorized to receive this message, you should not use, copy,
>>>> distribute, disclose or take any action based on the information contained
>>>> in this e-mail or any attachments. If you have received this message and
>>>> material in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
>>>> delete this message. Thank you on behalf of Applied Geographics, Inc.
>>>> (AppGeo).<DMEM OSGeo FOSS4G Contract (2).pdf><Financial Plan for FOSS4G 2017
>>>> - Spending Plan.pdf>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cameron Shorter,
>>>> Software and Data Solutions Manager
>>>> LISAsoft
>>>> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
>>>> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>>>>
>>>> P +61 2 9009 5000, W www.lisasoft.com, F +61 2 9009 5099
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Terner
>> Executive Vice President
>> 617-447-2468 Direct | 617-447-2400 Main
>> Applied Geographics, Inc.
>> 24 School Street, Suite 500
>> Boston, MA 02108
>> www.AppGeo.com
>>
>>
>> This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or legally
>> privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient or otherwise
>> authorized to receive this message, you should not use, copy, distribute,
>> disclose or take any action based on the information contained in this
>> e-mail or any attachments. If you have received this message and material in
>> error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
>> message. Thank you on behalf of Applied Geographics, Inc.
>> (AppGeo)._______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
More information about the Conference_dev
mailing list