[OSGeo-Conf] Stage 1 Voting results

[David Fawcett]

I can add that the committee had 100% good intent, but the 16th voter (me)
made an error in submitting their vote yesterday. Of course, the vote
shouldn't be counted, but even if it was, it wouldn't have changed the
overall outcome.

David

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:31 AM, <till.adams at fossgis.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> with that in my eyes we have two results:
>
> Bangkok and Dar es Salaam are official candidates and will be pleased to
> submit a full proposal.
> I yield to Steven to request this officially from both teams.
>
> And we have a functioning committee, as 14 out of 16 members voted, one
> officially recused - that's a good signal together.
>
> Till
>
>
>
>
> Am 2016-10-19 10:01, schrieb thomas bonfort:
>
>> Dear committee,
>> I have received a response from 15 out of 16 members, the results are:
>>
>> - Bangkok: 3
>> - Dar es Salaam: 10
>> - Lima: 1
>>
>> Gavin recused himself as he is on the Dar es Salaam loc.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Thomas (CRO)
>>
>>
>> Detailed voting tokens:
>>
>> Bangkok:
>> tlsdldksdkQk
>> %29f$Vwv5
>> no token
>>
>> Dar es Salaam:
>> screew
>> phlematic
>> astronaut
>> agriktamo
>> 477
>> E2127111
>> vanigs
>> 4571
>> aG7CM9ZADSGhCSyOSaJ0
>> 6ETI-UIL2-9WAX-XHYO
>>
>> Lima:
>> Turdus merula
>>
>>
>> Voters:
>> CameronS
>> ClaudeP
>> DarrelF
>> DavidB
>> EliA
>> JachymC
>> MariaB
>> PaulR
>> PeterB
>> SangheeS
>> StevenF
>> TillA
>> VasileC
>> VenkaR
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20161019/65bdd85d/attachment.html>