[OSGeo-Conf] Stage 1 Voting results

[Suchith Anand]

+1 . It will be great if Lima team can build up this as a FOSS4G-South America event. We now have FOSS4G regional events established in North America, Asia and Europe.

I really hope from next year, we will have regional events around the world and having South America and Africa starting regional events will be great to accelerate OSGeo around the world.

Maybe OSGeo Board and Conference Commitee can give some direction to Lima team on this?

Best wishes,

Suchith 

________________________________________
From: Conference_dev <conference_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com>
Sent: 20 October 2016 4:13 AM
To: conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] Stage 1 Voting results

FOSS4G Lima team,

While you have not been selected for the international FOSS4G event,
please don't be discouraged. I suggest you (and the rest of South and
Central America) consider running an annual South/Central America
FOSS4G, similar to the very successful FOSS4G-North America and
FOSS4G-Europe, which run in parallel with the International FOSS4G.

It could rotate between South/Central American cities.

I think there is a great opportunity to make this happen.

Warm regards, Cameron

On 20/10/2016 1:00 PM, Steven Feldman wrote:
> Thank you to all of the committee members for your stage 1 votes.
>
> I confirm that Dar es Salaam and Bangkok received the necessary votes to proceed to submit a full proposal in accord with the RfP process and timeline
>
> Our thanks to the Lima team for your Letter of Intent. I hope that you will continue to build FOSS4G in South America and that you will be back proposing FOSS4G Lima in 2021
>
> Cheers
>
> Steven
>
>
>> On 19 Oct 2016, at 06:13, till.adams at fossgis.de wrote:
>>
>> even better!
>>
>> Till
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 2016-10-19 14:12, schrieb David Fawcett:
>>> I can add that the committee had 100% good intent, but the 16th voter
>>> (me) made an error in submitting their vote yesterday. Of course, the
>>> vote shouldnt be counted, but even if it was, it wouldnt have changed
>>> the overall outcome.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:31 AM, <till.adams at fossgis.de [5]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> with that in my eyes we have two results:
>>>>
>>>> Bangkok and Dar es Salaam are official candidates and will be
>>>> pleased to submit a full proposal.
>>>> I yield to Steven to request this officially from both teams.
>>>>
>>>> And we have a functioning committee, as 14 out of 16 members voted,
>>>> one officially recused - thats a good signal together.
>>>>
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>> Am 2016-10-19 10:01, schrieb thomas bonfort:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear committee,
>>>>> I have received a response from 15 out of 16 members, the results
>>>>> are:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Bangkok: 3
>>>>> - Dar es Salaam: 10
>>>>> - Lima: 1
>>>>>
>>>>> Gavin recused himself as he is on the Dar es Salaam loc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Thomas (CRO)
>>>>>
>>>>> Detailed voting tokens:
>>>>>
>>>>> Bangkok:
>>>>> tlsdldksdkQk
>>>>> %29f$Vwv5
>>>>> no token
>>>>>
>>>>> Dar es Salaam:
>>>>> screew
>>>>> phlematic
>>>>> astronaut
>>>>> agriktamo
>>>>> 477
>>>>> E2127111
>>>>> vanigs
>>>>> 4571
>>>>> aG7CM9ZADSGhCSyOSaJ0
>>>>> 6ETI-UIL2-9WAX-XHYO
>>>>>
>>>>> Lima:
>>>>> Turdus merula
>>>>>
>>>>> Voters:
>>>>> CameronS
>>>>> ClaudeP
>>>>> DarrelF
>>>>> DavidB
>>>>> EliA
>>>>> JachymC
>>>>> MariaB
>>>>> PaulR
>>>>> PeterB
>>>>> SangheeS
>>>>> StevenF
>>>>> TillA
>>>>> VasileC
>>>>> VenkaR
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org [1]
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev [2]
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org [3]
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev [4]
>>>
>>>
>>> Links:
>>> ------
>>> [1] mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> [2] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>> [3] mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> [4] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>> [5] mailto:till.adams at fossgis.de
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev

--
Cameron Shorter
M +61 419 142 254

_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.