[OSGeo-Conf] [Board] travel grant discussion

Till Adams till.adams at fossgis.de
Thu May 11 13:02:47 PDT 2017


what means "meet" ?


Am 11.05.2017 22:02, schrieb Jody Garnett:
> Thanks Til- quick reply from phone - board has an action item to meet 
> with conference committee next week since there was no rep in today's 
> board meeting.
>
> See mins for budget suggestions.
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:42 PM Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de 
> <mailto:till.adams at fossgis.de>> wrote:
>
>     Dear Jody,
>
>     will have a look through ASAP. Hope others from confComm will also.
>
>     Maybe we schedule an IRC meeting for bringing this into motion?
>
>
>     Till
>
>
>
>
>     Am 10.05.2017 08:38, schrieb Jody Garnett:
>>     Happy to share the document (see attached).​
>>     Travel Grant Guidelines
>>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jYDOd87redxMHwT-xURcBrD7xwOeAPdVVLWZtIbM7-w/edit?usp=drive_web>
>>>>     I have put the travel grant thing on the agenda for Thursday
>>     board meeting; while i am sure we can handle it a rep from the
>>     conference committee may wish to attend.
>>
>>     Aside: I am focused on this as part of our OSGeo inclusive goal
>>     (so diversity and having it be broader in scope then just the
>>     annual foss4g event. I know that will be hard to focus on since
>>     foss4g boston has a short term need.
>>     --
>>     Jody Garnett
>>
>>     On 9 May 2017 at 23:30, Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de
>>     <mailto:till.adams at fossgis.de>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi,
>>
>>         thanks Eli for the sum up. I think the count of 9 votes (8 x
>>         +1, 1 x +0) shows, that we have enough capacity to run this
>>         topic.
>>
>>         In general I think the voting result is clear - if the board
>>         passes over this topic to us, we are ready to go.
>>         Then we can proceed to the next step, as Jody suggested in
>>         his mail from 4th of May and dive into his draft document.
>>         @Jody, could you please share this doc with us?
>>
>>         We have to keep Camerons thoughts in mind:
>>         - my intention was a restriction to global FOSS4G, but may be
>>         extended on a case by case basis to other events too - any
>>         other opinions here?
>>
>>         Also I think the handbook (that needs a re-work anyway) is a
>>         good place:
>>         https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Handbook
>>
>>         Also we should care about Michaels last email and request to
>>         care about Narcisse Mbunzama (email from 09.05.2017)
>>
>>
>>         Regards, Till
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         Am 10.05.2017 um 02:30 schrieb Eli Adam:
>>>         On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Steven Feldman<shfeldman at gmail.com>  <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>         Have we got enough votes to declare a decision? So far no one has voted -1
>>>         I count eight +1s and one +0 so that is enough.  [0]
>>>         https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Committee#Decisions
>>>
>>>>         What was the expiry time for voting?
>>>         Rereading, Till's email, I now see that he set an entirely reasonable
>>>         timeline of May 10th, [1]
>>>         https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/2017-May/004344.html
>>>
>>>         I mistakenly complained about an short timespan in my response
>>>         apparently based on a terrible misreading of the date.
>>>
>>>         I expect that Till will "6. The result will be clearly declared
>>>         afterwards." [0] once the timeline expires.
>>>
>>>         Best regards, Eli
>>>
>>>         [0]https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Committee#Decisions
>>>         [1]https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/2017-May/004344.html
>>>
>>>>         Steven
>>>>         07958 924 101
>>>>
>>>>         On 9 May 2017, at 21:05, Michael Terner<mgt at appgeo.com>  <mailto:mgt at appgeo.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         Off list, as not sure of process and this emanates from Jody (i.e., I assume
>>>>         he knows process; and may have avoided cross post to ConfDev
>>>>         intentionally?)...
>>>>
>>>>         But, heads-up that from Board's perspective they're waiting for ConfDev to
>>>>         report back, and are hoping for something by Thursday (see below)...
>>>>
>>>>         MT
>>>>
>>>>         ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>         From: Jody Garnett<jody.garnett at gmail.com>  <mailto:jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>>>>         Date: Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:27 PM Subject: Re: [Board]
>>>>         travel grant discussion To: "board at lists.osgeo.org"
>>>>         <mailto:board at lists.osgeo.org> <board at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>         <mailto:board at lists.osgeo.org> I closed the loomio vote
>>>>         while we wait for a response from the conference committee.
>>>>         I note that discussion is getting into details
>>>>         (finance,scope,value,history) rather than focused on the
>>>>         question: Is the conference committee willing to accept the
>>>>         responsibility for a travel grant program. I hope we can
>>>>         hear back in time for our meeting Thursday, it would be
>>>>         good to have this well underway by the end of the month (as
>>>>         potential foss4g, foss4g-europe attendees will need to
>>>>         apply shortly). -- Jody Garnett On 23 April 2017 at 22:25,
>>>>         Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>>>>         <mailto:jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>         As noted in last weeks meeting, we have an action to move travel grant
>>>>>         discussion to email. The motivation is to build on the work done at FOSS4G
>>>>>         2015, FOSS4G 2016 and a few local events.
>>>>>
>>>>>         I would like to propose:
>>>>>         - A format, similar to code sprints, where any OSGeo event can apply for
>>>>>         funds to run a travel grants
>>>>>         - To repeat this is not a FOSS4G specific idea
>>>>>         - I am interested in using travel grants to promote diversity within our
>>>>>         community
>>>>>
>>>>>         A final comment is that travel grants are not a viable solution to high
>>>>>         event costs. If we wish to offer discounts for students we should do so
>>>>>         (rather than lean on a travel grant program).
>>>>>         --
>>>>>         Jody Garnett
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         Board mailing list
>>>>         Board at lists.osgeo.org  <mailto:Board at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>         https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         --
>>>>         Michael Terner
>>>>         Executive Vice President
>>>>         617-447-2468  <tel:%28617%29%20447-2468>  Direct |617-447-2400  <tel:%28617%29%20447-2400>  Main
>>>>         Applied Geographics, Inc.
>>>>         24 School Street, Suite 500
>>>>         Boston, MA 02108
>>>>         www.AppGeo.com  <http://www.AppGeo.com>
>>>>
>>>>         This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or legally
>>>>         privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient or otherwise
>>>>         authorized to receive this message, you should not use, copy, distribute,
>>>>         disclose or take any action based on the information contained in this
>>>>         e-mail or any attachments. If you have received this message and material in
>>>>         error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
>>>>         message. Thank you on behalf of Applied Geographics, Inc. (AppGeo).
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> -- 
> Jody Garnett

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20170511/9bcb78f1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Conference_dev mailing list