[OSGeo-Conf] Start 2019 RFP / Call for vote on "publishingLoIvotes"

[신상희]

Hi all, 

Steven and Maria raised good points. How about compromising this by not releasing the results at 1st stage and publishing the votes number at final stage. I believe 1st stage is just qualifying stage and announcing any team will proceed to 2nd stage is enough without mentioning specific vote numbers at the 1st stage. 

Cheers, 
신상희
---
Shin, Sanghee
Gaia3D, Inc. - The GeoSpatial Company
http://www.gaia3d.com 

보낸 사람: María Arias de Reyna
보낸 날짜: 2017년 9월 4일 월요일 오후 11:45
받는 사람: stevenfeldman
참조: conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
제목: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] Start 2019 RFP / Call for vote on "publishingLoIvotes"

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:39 PM, stevenfeldman <shfeldman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sanghee said "Me too. +1 for not disclosing the vote numbers at any stage. "
>
> My suggestion to publish LoI votes was based on the very low threshold for
> inclusion in the next stage. If an LoI only needs 2 votes to go on to the
> next stage we may be putting a team to a lot of work in preparing a full
> proposal when they have little chance of being successful, hence my
> suggestion.

Why little chance? A proposal may not seem good until it has been
fully described in detail. Not everyone is fluent in English, not
everyone is good at showing their ideas. Personally (as an interested
party this year) I don't care how many votes receive each proposal, as
all of them should try as hard as they could to get the better
proposal. In fact, I think no one should be discarded on the first
phase unless their first draft is so awful it is clear they cannot
work on a good proposal.
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20170905/588a05b4/attachment.html>