[OSGeo-Conf] Michael Terners Questions / Remarks on Calgary proposal - please answer

Till Adams till.adams at fossgis.de
Thu Dec 6 07:52:52 PST 2018


Cool, thanks!

Till


Am 06.12.18 um 15:43 schrieb Jonathan Neufeld:
>
> Hi Till,
>
>  
>
> Thank you very much – we’ll provide an answer before noon today (local
> time)
>
>  
>
> Cheers,
> Jon
>
>  
>
> *From:*Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de>
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 6, 2018 5:29 AM
> *To:* conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org; Jonathan Neufeld
> <jneufeld at tecterra.com>
> *Subject:* [OSGeo-Conf] Michael Terners Questions / Remarks on Calgary
> proposal - please answer
>
>  
>
> Dear Calgary team!
>
> although the questions from Michael came in late yesterday and
> although you already sent your final statement - the questions came in
> in time, so could you please answer to these quesitons too (it's
> already on the WIKI)?
>
> I will give a note to wait to all voting menbers when calling for the
> vote.
>
> Thanks & good luck!
>
> Till
>
>  
>
> Am 05.12.18 um 23:57 schrieb michael terner:
>
>     /These questions are also posted on the Wiki site.../
>
>      
>
>     Thanks for all the hard work on your excellent and comprehensive
>     proposal. A few questions:
>
>       * In the narrative and budget details document I didn't find any
>         mention of a Professional Conference Organizer (PCO) which has
>         been a component, and expense of recent conferences. Will
>         there be a PCO? If so, how, and at what level will they be funded?
>       * Under Section IV.V Seed Funding, there is some mention of
>         TECTERRA providing "in-kind contributions of staff time for
>         planning and hosting the event". Is this the equivalent of a
>         PCO? If so, is there an estimate of the value of this in-kind
>         contribution (as that will help to understand level of
>         PCO-like support that might be available)? Will TECTERRA be
>         providing PCO-like services such as banking, registration
>         system, abstract collection/scoring system, support staff
>         (e.g., registration and setup), administration of the mobile
>         app, etc., during the event?
>
>     Again, congratulations and a great and compelling proposal. Good
>     luck...
>
>      
>
>     MT
>
>      
>
>     On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:18 AM Steven Feldman
>     <shfeldman at gmail.com <mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         Hi Calgary team
>
>          
>
>         Thanks for your great proposal
>
>          
>
>         Following on from Till’s questions here are a few more from me:
>
>          
>
>          1. In your vision statement you say that FOOS4G will be “...a
>             catalyst to foster the democratization of opportunity that
>             open-sources represents for creators at every scale…”
>             Could you explain further (particularly for people on this
>             list for whom English is not their first language)
>          2. Can you confirm that although visas are not required for
>             some countries an ETA will be required?
>          3. Can you provide clarity on whether you will be videoing
>             and/or streaming all or some of the conference streams? Is
>             this provided for in your budget?
>          4. Your budget has a high dependency on sponsorship, what are
>             your contingencies if your target is not achieved?
>          5. If you do not receive specific funding for the gala
>             evening what will be the charge to delegates in USD?
>          6. Can you confirm that you will not be seeking any seed
>             funding or guarantees from OSGeo?
>          7. You appear to make very little additional profit from
>             higher levels of attendance. Can you explain?
>          8. Is there any option to reduce the costs of catering to
>             either reduce ticket prices or increase surplus?
>          9. Is the 50% share of surplus contribution to OSGeo negotiable?
>         10. The co-hosting alongside Inventure$ 2020 radically changes
>             your budget and proposal. Can you provide some more
>             detailed info on this opportunity and clarify whether this
>             is your preference ()and if so why you did not base your
>             proposal around it?)
>         11. Can you confirm that the workshop fee of US $200 ids for 2
>             full days of workshops. Is there an option for attendees
>             to register for only 1 or 2 workshops individually?
>         12. Can you confirm whether you are offering a discount on
>             delegate fees to workshop presenters?
>         13. In your budget you have a line for printing a programme.
>             Can you explain? (in the last 2 years we have had digital
>             programmes)
>         14. You make no mention of producing a conference t-shirt or
>             the costs, is that correct or have I missed it?
>         15. You mention a Travel Grant Programme - is this the OSGeo
>             TGP initiative or one that will be run independently by
>             your LOC?
>         16. Can you confirm that any funds allocated to a TGP (your
>             own or the OSGeo one) will be used for travel and
>             subsistence support and that all TGP recipients will
>             receive a free conference pass in addition (i.e the TGP
>             funds will not be used to cover delegate passes)?
>
>          
>
>         I’ve dropped a copy of these questions into the wiki
>         at https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G2020_Q%26A_2_Calgary
>         <https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G2020_Q&A_2_Calgary> - it’s
>         probably easier for everyone reviewing if you post your
>         answers to the wiki rather than stretching this mail trail.
>
>          
>
>         Cheers
>
>         ______
>         Steven
>
>
>
>
>             On 26 Nov 2018, at 07:16, Till Adams
>             <till.adams at fossgis.de <mailto:till.adams at fossgis.de>> wrote:
>
>              
>
>             Dear Calgary Team!
>
>             I open the question round on step 2 of RfP with these two
>             questions:
>
>               * "The remaining 50% of profit will be held in-trust by
>                 TECTERRA and used as a travel grant program for
>                 Alberta-based students to travel to future
>                 international FOSS4G events (Page 40):
>
>             In the FOSS4G cookbook [1] it is not clearly defined, how
>             much of the revenue has to be passed back to OSGeo, but
>             there is a not yet decided proposal that 85% of a FOSS4G
>             surplus goes to OSGeo. The idea to hold 50% in order to
>             setup a dedicated travel grant programme for Alberta
>             people for future OSGeo events only sounds little strange
>             to me - especially as there is an official travel grant
>             programme of OSGeo. Can you please explain your ideas
>             behind that a bit more?
>
>               * Finances
>
>             Your calculation is based between 24-30% on sponsorship -
>             depending on scenario "LOW" or "GOAL". Even when regarding
>             the already signed sponsorships, in any case there is a
>             need to sign at least a sum of 150k more
>             sponsorship-money, in order to reach a balanced budget. Do
>             you have an emergency plan, what happens if something
>             unexpected may happen or what to do when missing your
>             sponsorship goal?
>
>             I also put the questions into the WIKI [2]. Please put
>             your answers also there.
>
>              
>
>             Regards, Till
>
>              
>
>             [1] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Handbook#Finances,
>             bullet (7)
>
>             [2] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G2020_Q%26A_2_Calgary
>
>              
>
>              
>
>              
>
>             ------------------------------------------------
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             Conference_dev mailing list
>             Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>             <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>             https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>          
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Conference_dev mailing list
>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>         https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>
>      
>
>     -- 
>
>     Michael Terner
>
>     ternergeo at gmail.com <mailto:ternergeo at gmail.com>
>
>     (M) 978-631-6602
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Conference_dev mailing list
>
>     Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>
>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20181206/95e5d501/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Conference_dev mailing list