[OSGeo-Conf] [Board] Final Result on RfP 2020
vasile at geo-spatial.org
Tue Dec 18 07:19:55 PST 2018
The total number of votes is 13. Not all of them went to Calgary. They just got more votes than Halifax.
Congratulations to both teams for the impressing proposals.
Sent from my mobile device
> On 18 Dec 2018, at 17:01, Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de> wrote:
> Hello all
> This is Vicky from Halifax team.
> Congratulations Calgary for the impressive win of 13 votes.
> I wonder if someone can give some feed back on what we did so, so so wrong that we didn't get any vote?
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 8:34 AM María Arias de Reyna <delawen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 2:12 PM michael terner <ternergeo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> +1 on Til's fair and accurate response.
>>> Indeed, it was a fair and open process, with only the vote being non-public but supervised by two respected CROs. As observed by Til, the one "issue" that arose on the recusal was addressed on the public Conference Dev mailing list. Actually, the only thing that is not open is the origin of the phrase used in Maria's first email today: "there has been some concerns raised." Where are these "concerns" coming from? When were they raised? Are they limited to the "recusal issue" from Venka? If not, what are the additional concerns?
>> No, no additional concerns. Just the one made on the conference dev mailing list.
>> Board mailing list
>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
> Salzmannstraße 44,
> 81739 München, Germany
> Vicky Vergara
> Operations Research
> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
> Web: https://georepublic.info
> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
> CEO: Daniel Kastl
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Conference_dev