[OSGeo-Conf] [Board] Final Result on RfP 2020

MarĂ­a Arias de Reyna delawen at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 06:33:48 PST 2018

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 2:12 PM michael terner <ternergeo at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 on Til's fair and accurate response.
> Indeed, it was a fair and open process, with only the vote being
> non-public but supervised by two respected CROs. As observed by Til, the
> one "issue" that arose on the recusal was addressed on the public
> Conference Dev mailing list. Actually, the only thing that is not open is
> the origin of the phrase used in Maria's first email today: "there has
> been some concerns raised." Where are these "concerns" coming from? When
> were they raised? Are they limited to the "recusal issue" from Venka? If
> not, what are the additional concerns?

No, no additional concerns. Just the one made on the conference dev
mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20181218/8ef933bf/attachment.html>

More information about the Conference_dev mailing list