[OSGeo-Conf] Fwd: [Board] Final Result on RfP 2020

Tue Dec 18 11:08:07 PST 2018

I was not on the list so I am re-sending my mail

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <conference_dev-owner at lists.osgeo.org>
Date: Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] [Board] Final Result on RfP 2020
To: <vicky at georepublic.de>

Your message has been rejected, probably because you are not
subscribed to the mailing list and the list's policy is to prohibit
non-members from posting to it.  If you think that your messages are
being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at
conference_dev-owner at lists.osgeo.org.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>
To: Conference Dev <conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
Cc: Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>
Bcc:
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:56:53 -0600
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] [Board] Final Result on RfP 2020
Hello Conference Committee members:

On recommendation of Paul Ramsey, and using his terminology

As member of the Halifax team:
I would like to make a "post-mortem" public request of:
Clarifying the details of the results of the second phase.
Based on the details of that result I would make or no make a "post-mortem"
confidential request for feedback

Consider that:
>From my point of view, 12-1 7-6 make a huge difference
As some results like 12-1 for me means: that we, Halifax team, did
something really wrong (Would make the "post-mortem" confidential request).
As other results like 7-6 , for me means: that we, Halifax team, did a very
good job, and the decision was tough.

Regards
Vicky (member of the Halifax team)

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:22 AM Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>
wrote:

> I don't think the numbers, whether 12-1 or 7-6 will be particularly
> explanatory. If you want a post-mortem to apply to future bids I'd suggest
> approaching committee members on a confidential basis for their feedback on
> their personal decision process... I imagine a pattern would emerge (I hope
> a pattern would emerge!) after a few conversations.
>
> P.
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 7:33 AM Vasile Craciunescu <vasile at geo-spatial.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Well, traditionally, the results are not made public, only the winner is
>> disclosed.
>>
>> Vasile
>>
>> Sent from my mobile device
>>
>> On 18 Dec 2018, at 17:25, Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de> wrote:
>>
>> Ah, how much more? 12-1 still worries me
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM Vasile Craciunescu <
>> vasile at geo-spatial.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Vicky,
>>>
>>> The total number of votes is 13. Not all of them went to Calgary. They
>>> just got more votes than Halifax.
>>>
>>> Congratulations to both teams for the impressing proposals.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Vasile
>>>
>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>>
>>> On 18 Dec 2018, at 17:01, Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all
>>> This is Vicky from Halifax team.
>>>
>>> Congratulations Calgary for the impressive win of 13 votes.
>>>
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/2018-December/005017.html
>>>
>>> I wonder if someone can give some feed back on what we did so, so so
>>> wrong that we didn't get any vote?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Vicky
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 8:34 AM María Arias de Reyna <delawen at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 2:12 PM michael terner <ternergeo at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 on Til's fair and accurate response.
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed, it was a fair and open process, with only the vote being
>>>>> non-public but supervised by two respected CROs. As observed by Til, the
>>>>> one "issue" that arose on the recusal was addressed on the public
>>>>> Conference Dev mailing list. Actually, the only thing that is not open is
>>>>> the origin of the phrase used in Maria's first email today: "there
>>>>> has been some concerns raised." Where are these "concerns"
>>>>> coming from? When were they raised? Are they limited to the "recusal issue"
>>>>> from Venka? If not, what are the additional concerns?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, no additional concerns. Just the one made on the conference dev
>>>> mailing list.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Board mailing list
>>>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
>>> Salzmannstraße 44,
>>> 81739 München, Germany
>>>
>>> Vicky Vergara
>>> Operations Research
>>>
>>> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
>>> Web: https://georepublic.info
>>>
>>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>>>
>>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>>> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Board mailing list
>>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
>> Salzmannstraße 44,
>> 81739 München, Germany
>>
>> Vicky Vergara
>> Operations Research
>>
>> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
>> Web: https://georepublic.info
>>
>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>>
>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>

-- 

Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Salzmannstraße 44,
81739 München, Germany

Vicky Vergara
Operations Research

eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
Web: https://georepublic.info

Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9

Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
CEO: Daniel Kastl

-- 

Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Salzmannstraße 44,
81739 München, Germany

Vicky Vergara
Operations Research

eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
Web: https://georepublic.info

Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9

Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
CEO: Daniel Kastl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20181218/cc05c2ee/attachment-0001.html>