[OSGeo-Conf] Draft RfP document FOSS4G 2020

[Guido Stein]

Good points,

I think announcement that the proposal has been submitted makes sense.

Guido

On Sat, Sep 15, 2018, 3:46 PM Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 11:49 PM, Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de>
> wrote:
> > Guido,
> >
> > Most importantly to me and perhaps should be discussed here is that I
> think
> > that we should make the collection of the full proposals private until we
> > are ready to release them all on the wiki. This would make it possible
> for
> > people who turned their proposals early to feel secure that their
> > competitors are not using the information from their publicly shared
> > proposal in the competitive bid.
> >
>
> Sounds reasonable.  I think that the old method was a combination of
> waiting until close to the deadline and thinking that if other LOCs
> need to look at yours, they've got no chance anyway.
>
> >
> > the 2 times I was involved, we had once only 1 proposal, for 2019 the
> > proposals came in within the last 2 hours of the period. So this was no
> > issue, but I see your point.
> >
> > In order to keep this fair also, we might have two people out of CC who
> > receive the proposals and these 2 have the duty to release them on the
> list
> > when the proposal period ends. As chair, I can be one of these two.
>
> I would still like to require that the LOCs email the list before the
> deadline that they have turned in their proposals.  This ensures that
> they are subscribed to the mailing list, who speaks for the LOC,
> directs response questions and comments at them, etc.  It also lets
> them set the subject line and otherwise establish the groundwork for
> their bid.  It also publicly announces it before the deadline.  Then
> you or any designated third party can reply with the attachment after
> the deadline.
>
>
> Best regards, Eli
>
> >
> > Till
> >
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have an objection to this?
> >
> > Guido
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 9:28 AM Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear CC!
> >>
> >> We have a draft of the RfP document for the 2020 call now:
> >>
> >> The draft RfP is
> >> at
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/14ltOnAoiFSTl7ERdlFKUvx-Jh9eDpVQgEn4AoCIp4SE/edit?usp=sharing
> >>
> >> Due to Steven, this is an open document, anyone with the link can view
> >> and comment.
> >>
> >> I know we are little late, but the document is based on the RfP of the
> >> past years. Feel free to comment on this document until *this* friday
> >> (14.09.2018) 12h CET, after that I will kick out the call for 2020 and
> >> we have to finalize the document and resolute all comments.
> >>
> >> Special thanks to Steven and Michael, who did the main work and
> >> improvements on this document!
> >>
> >> Till
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Conference_dev mailing list
> >> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Conference_dev mailing list
> > Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Conference_dev mailing list
> > Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20180916/8d33c24b/attachment.html>