[OSGeo-Conf] R: R: *early* Preparation of RFP 2021

[Maria Antonia Brovelli]

I believe that having a large committee of always silent people is useless. Better less, but active.

After having proposed, if people don't show up, I propose to remove them. It could be not the first year, we can consider if this happens for two following years.

I like neither removement nor auto-removement but I don't see the point of being in a Committee if one person has not time for voting once a year.

Thanks a lot!
Best,
Maria





Inviato dal mio dispositivo Samsung


-------- Messaggio originale --------
Da: Till Adams <adams at terrestris.de>
Data: 05/06/19 11:51 (GMT+01:00)
A: conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
Oggetto: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] R:  *early* Preparation of RFP 2021

Maria,

we can do the following (and that is what I did last year):

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-> ask whether people will vote on RFP

[wait]

-> re-ask those, who did not reply

[wait]

-> propose those who do not want to vote AND those who did not reply, to
leave the committee.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Indeed, there are some people, that did not vote for the past years, but
is auto-removement really what we want to do in our community?


Till



Am 05.06.19 um 11:44 schrieb Maria Antonia Brovelli:
> Dear Stefan, Till and All
> I don't agree in changing the rules of the voting. It is the main
> commitment of the CC members. I prefere that people who don't have time
> for more than X years, ask to be removed from the Committee.
> Best,
> Maria
>
>
>
> Inviato dal mio dispositivo Samsung
>
>
> -------- Messaggio originale --------
> Da: Till Adams <adams at terrestris.de>
> Data: 05/06/19 11:33 (GMT+01:00)
> A: conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> Oggetto: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] *early* Preparation of RFP 2021
>
> Dear Steven,
>
> thanks for correction ;-).
>
> I agree on shorten the question period for stage 1. Nothing happened in
> the past days of this period in the past RFP's as far as I can remember.
>
> Regarding the voting: I agree and wanted to ask the CC members anyway in
> advance. We can agree on changing the votring process in general, so
> that gets part of our rules. I will prepare a motion towards this ;-)
>
> Till
>
>
> Am 05.06.19 um 11:20 schrieb Steven Feldman:
>> Great work Till, thank you
>>
>> I think there was an error in the opening line:
>>
>> "FOSS4G 2021 will most likely be held in North America.”
>>
>> I have changed to:
>>
>> "FOSS4G 2021 will most likely be held in "Other Regions”.”
>>
>> Re *timeline*: could we bring the decision date for Stage 1 forward to
>> 14 or 15 October (shorten the question period if necessary) to give a
>> little more time for proposal writing?
>>
>> *Voting*: Last year we had a small problem in getting sufficient votes
>> for a quorum. Should we consider a slight change given the size of the
>> committee?
>> *Suggestion*: Before the call process commences all committee members
>> are asked to confirm that they wish to be included as voters for the
>> call, any that do not confirm would be considered recused for this vote
>> but would remain a member of the committee for future votes. That way
>> the >50% votes required for a quorum should not be a problem.
>>
>> Cheers
>> ______
>> Steven
>>
>> Unusual maps in strange places -  mappery.org <http://mappery.org>
>>
>> Subscribe to my weekly “Maps in the Wild <http://eepurl.com/dKStT-/>”
>> newsletter
>>
>>> On 5 Jun 2019, at 08:07, Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de
>>> <mailto:till.adams at fossgis.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear CC!
>>>
>>> I had some minutes and started an *early* prepare of the call for 2021.
>>>
>>> I added this WIKI page here:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2021_Bid_Process
>>>
>>> Please check carefully whether the dates fit for you and of course for
>>> other errors.
>>>
>>>
>>> I will prepapre the needed documents in the next days and send them to
>>> you.
>>>
>>> Have a great day!
>>>
>>> Till
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>    SHOGun - das WebGIS Framework
> FOSS4G in Bukarest! 2019.foss4g.org
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> Mail: adams at terrestris.de
> Tel.: +49 (0)228 - 962 899 52
>
> terrestris GmbH & Co. KG
> Kölnstraße 99
> 53111 Bonn
>
> Tel.: +49 (0)228 - 962 899 51
> Fax.: +49 (0)228 - 962 899 57
>
> Internet: www.terrestris.de<http://www.terrestris.de> <http://www.terrestris.de>
>
> Amtsgericht Bonn, HRA 6835
>
> Komplementärin: terrestris Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH vertreten durch:
> Torsten Brassat, Marc Jansen, Hinrich Paulsen, Till Adams
>
> Informationen über Ihre gespeicherten Daten finden Sie auf unserer
> Homepage unter folgendem Link:
> https://www.terrestris.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev

--
------------------------------------------------

   SHOGun - das WebGIS Framework
FOSS4G in Bukarest! 2019.foss4g.org

------------------------------------------------
Mail: adams at terrestris.de
Tel.: +49 (0)228 - 962 899 52

terrestris GmbH & Co. KG
Kölnstraße 99
53111 Bonn

Tel.: +49 (0)228 - 962 899 51
Fax.: +49 (0)228 - 962 899 57

Internet: www.terrestris.de<http://www.terrestris.de>

Amtsgericht Bonn, HRA 6835

Komplementärin: terrestris Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH vertreten durch:
Torsten Brassat, Marc Jansen, Hinrich Paulsen, Till Adams

Informationen über Ihre gespeicherten Daten finden Sie auf unserer
Homepage unter folgendem Link:
https://www.terrestris.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
_______________________________________________
Conference_dev mailing list
Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20190605/b7d5773b/attachment.html>