[OSGeo-Conf] RfP Document for RfP 2021

[Eli Adam]

This time resent to include the list.

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:02 PM Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm somewhat indifferent on platform as long as SAC is supporting it
> or it is otherwise reliable.  I've not kept up to date on OSGeo Gitea.
> Which projects use this as their primary repo?
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 6:17 AM Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Till (and all the others),
> >
> > I suggest, we move from SVN to Gitea [1] One of the advantages is
> > (except from - it's GIT!) is, that everybody with OSGeo UserID can
> > acces
>
> There is already a process to grant people SVN access,
> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Subversion#Add.2FRemove_Committer and I've
> offered to give access to anyone (appropriate) who wants it.  I think
> that Till already has rights here.  I'm also glad to make commits for
> anyone as needed if they for some reason don't want to do it
> themselves.
>
> I'm not really in favor of change for the sake of change but if it
> leads to more people contributing, I'm all for that!  Who would
> contribute if we switch to Gitea?
>
> This url, https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/conference-commitee/foss4g, 404s
> for me.  If we go this route, will this be a publicly accessible url
> where anyone can track the progress?
>
> If SAC is supporting Gitea, other OSGeo projects use it as their
> primary repo, additional people will/might contribute, and it provides
> a publicly accessible url, then I'm all for switching.  Thanks for
> suggesting this Jachym.
>
> Best regards, Eli
>
>
> >
> > ok?
> >
> > J
> >
> >
> > [1] https://git.osgeo.org/gitea
> >
> > po 2. 9. 2019 v 15:14 odesílatel Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> napsal:
> > >
> > > Hi CC,
> > >
> > > I made a copy of last years RfP document here:
> > >
> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SUA7Kt6EEtLj6ZWSensMjFnMNxCamXe4jupmKN-O-kc
> > >
> > > and shared it with the same people, so you should be able to edit (if
> > > not, please ask me). As we do not have much time left (the call will go
> > > out this friday on 6th of September) and nobody clearly stated needs to
> > > alter this document. so I regard it more or less as finished (@Guido: I
> > > accepted most of your comments/changes from last year). Nevertheless,
> > > please feel free to read and make minor changes, that improve the
> > > quality of the document or add s.th. important, that we missed before.
> > >
> > > Can someone with SVN access upload this document as Pdf on
> > > https://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/rfp/2021/FOSS4G2021-request-for-proposal.pdf
> > > (as linked here: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2021_Bid_Process)
> > > *before* this friday?
> > >
> > > I think we do not need any changes on the budget template sheet.
> > >
> > > As CRO's I have agreed with Codrina and Arnulf, they will receive and
> > > count your votes and inform me with the final results of the voting steps.
> > >
> > >
> > > So far & all the best, regards,
> > >
> > >
> > > Till
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jachym Cepicky
> > e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com
> > URL: http://les-ejk.cz
> > GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp