[OSGeo-Conf] RfP Document for RfP 2021

[Till Adams]

Jachym,

I accepted the last small edits of Paul now, could you please load up
the RfP document [1] today and send me a message, that all is ready ;-) ?

When you added it, could you also adapt the link to the document in [2],
I tzhink it makes sense to put the financial sheets also in the new
repo, can you also do that and alter the link?


Many thanks,

Till


[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SUA7Kt6EEtLj6ZWSensMjFnMNxCamXe4jupmKN-O-kc

[2] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2021_Bid_Process -> chapter "RFP
Documents"



Am 04.09.19 um 16:59 schrieb Eli Adam:
> This time resent to include the list.
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:02 PM Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm somewhat indifferent on platform as long as SAC is supporting it
>> or it is otherwise reliable.  I've not kept up to date on OSGeo Gitea.
>> Which projects use this as their primary repo?
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 6:17 AM Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Till (and all the others),
>>>
>>> I suggest, we move from SVN to Gitea [1] One of the advantages is
>>> (except from - it's GIT!) is, that everybody with OSGeo UserID can
>>> acces
>> There is already a process to grant people SVN access,
>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Subversion#Add.2FRemove_Committer and I've
>> offered to give access to anyone (appropriate) who wants it.  I think
>> that Till already has rights here.  I'm also glad to make commits for
>> anyone as needed if they for some reason don't want to do it
>> themselves.
>>
>> I'm not really in favor of change for the sake of change but if it
>> leads to more people contributing, I'm all for that!  Who would
>> contribute if we switch to Gitea?
>>
>> This url, https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/conference-commitee/foss4g, 404s
>> for me.  If we go this route, will this be a publicly accessible url
>> where anyone can track the progress?
>>
>> If SAC is supporting Gitea, other OSGeo projects use it as their
>> primary repo, additional people will/might contribute, and it provides
>> a publicly accessible url, then I'm all for switching.  Thanks for
>> suggesting this Jachym.
>>
>> Best regards, Eli
>>
>>
>>> ok?
>>>
>>> J
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://git.osgeo.org/gitea
>>>
>>> po 2. 9. 2019 v 15:14 odesílatel Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> napsal:
>>>> Hi CC,
>>>>
>>>> I made a copy of last years RfP document here:
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SUA7Kt6EEtLj6ZWSensMjFnMNxCamXe4jupmKN-O-kc
>>>>
>>>> and shared it with the same people, so you should be able to edit (if
>>>> not, please ask me). As we do not have much time left (the call will go
>>>> out this friday on 6th of September) and nobody clearly stated needs to
>>>> alter this document. so I regard it more or less as finished (@Guido: I
>>>> accepted most of your comments/changes from last year). Nevertheless,
>>>> please feel free to read and make minor changes, that improve the
>>>> quality of the document or add s.th. important, that we missed before.
>>>>
>>>> Can someone with SVN access upload this document as Pdf on
>>>> https://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/rfp/2021/FOSS4G2021-request-for-proposal.pdf
>>>> (as linked here: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2021_Bid_Process)
>>>> *before* this friday?
>>>>
>>>> I think we do not need any changes on the budget template sheet.
>>>>
>>>> As CRO's I have agreed with Codrina and Arnulf, they will receive and
>>>> count your votes and inform me with the final results of the voting steps.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So far & all the best, regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jachym Cepicky
>>> e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com
>>> URL: http://les-ejk.cz
>>> GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev