[OSGeo-Conf] RfP Document for RfP 2021

[Till Adams]

Eli, @all,

sry, I did not reply. Personnally I don't mind, as I have no big clue
about these repos - my development time was in times of SVN ... ;-)

In general I agee, the repo must be open to pulic. If tht is not the
case ,we should stay with the old one. To be sure (I know I have access
somewhere) could you please upload the latest Rfp2021 doc into the ld SVN?

We have to kick out the call by tomorrow.

Thanks, Till


Am 05.09.19 um 17:06 schrieb Eli Adam:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 12:23 AM Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> wrote:
>> Jachym,
>>
>> I accepted the last small edits of Paul now, could you please load up
>> the RfP document [1] today and send me a message, that all is ready ;-) ?
> This new Gitea repo should be public and not private right?
>
> Till and others who is planning on directly making commits to the new
> repo?  I'm hoping that it will be at least a few people.
>
> Best regards, Eli
>
>> When you added it, could you also adapt the link to the document in [2],
>> I tzhink it makes sense to put the financial sheets also in the new
>> repo, can you also do that and alter the link?
>>
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Till
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SUA7Kt6EEtLj6ZWSensMjFnMNxCamXe4jupmKN-O-kc
>>
>> [2] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2021_Bid_Process -> chapter "RFP
>> Documents"
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 04.09.19 um 16:59 schrieb Eli Adam:
>>> This time resent to include the list.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:02 PM Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'm somewhat indifferent on platform as long as SAC is supporting it
>>>> or it is otherwise reliable.  I've not kept up to date on OSGeo Gitea.
>>>> Which projects use this as their primary repo?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 6:17 AM Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Till (and all the others),
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest, we move from SVN to Gitea [1] One of the advantages is
>>>>> (except from - it's GIT!) is, that everybody with OSGeo UserID can
>>>>> acces
>>>> There is already a process to grant people SVN access,
>>>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Subversion#Add.2FRemove_Committer and I've
>>>> offered to give access to anyone (appropriate) who wants it.  I think
>>>> that Till already has rights here.  I'm also glad to make commits for
>>>> anyone as needed if they for some reason don't want to do it
>>>> themselves.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not really in favor of change for the sake of change but if it
>>>> leads to more people contributing, I'm all for that!  Who would
>>>> contribute if we switch to Gitea?
>>>>
>>>> This url, https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/conference-commitee/foss4g, 404s
>>>> for me.  If we go this route, will this be a publicly accessible url
>>>> where anyone can track the progress?
>>>>
>>>> If SAC is supporting Gitea, other OSGeo projects use it as their
>>>> primary repo, additional people will/might contribute, and it provides
>>>> a publicly accessible url, then I'm all for switching.  Thanks for
>>>> suggesting this Jachym.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards, Eli
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ok?
>>>>>
>>>>> J
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://git.osgeo.org/gitea
>>>>>
>>>>> po 2. 9. 2019 v 15:14 odesílatel Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> napsal:
>>>>>> Hi CC,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I made a copy of last years RfP document here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SUA7Kt6EEtLj6ZWSensMjFnMNxCamXe4jupmKN-O-kc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and shared it with the same people, so you should be able to edit (if
>>>>>> not, please ask me). As we do not have much time left (the call will go
>>>>>> out this friday on 6th of September) and nobody clearly stated needs to
>>>>>> alter this document. so I regard it more or less as finished (@Guido: I
>>>>>> accepted most of your comments/changes from last year). Nevertheless,
>>>>>> please feel free to read and make minor changes, that improve the
>>>>>> quality of the document or add s.th. important, that we missed before.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can someone with SVN access upload this document as Pdf on
>>>>>> https://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/rfp/2021/FOSS4G2021-request-for-proposal.pdf
>>>>>> (as linked here: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2021_Bid_Process)
>>>>>> *before* this friday?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we do not need any changes on the budget template sheet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As CRO's I have agreed with Codrina and Arnulf, they will receive and
>>>>>> count your votes and inform me with the final results of the voting steps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So far & all the best, regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jachym Cepicky
>>>>> e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com
>>>>> URL: http://les-ejk.cz
>>>>> GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev