[OSGeo-Conf] RfP Document for RfP 2021

Thu Sep 5 11:45:44 PDT 2019

so . my action is no longer required?

čt 5. 9. 2019 v 19:24 odesílatel Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> napsal:
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:52 AM Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> wrote:
> >
> > Eli, @all,
> >
> > sry, I did not reply. Personnally I don't mind, as I have no big clue
> > about these repos - my development time was in times of SVN ... ;-)
> >
> > In general I agee, the repo must be open to pulic. If tht is not the
> > case ,we should stay with the old one. To be sure (I know I have access
> > somewhere) could you please upload the latest Rfp2021 doc into the ld SVN?
>
> You have commit rights to the SVN repo or if that isn't your OSGeo
> userid, I can add it.  Do any other Conference Committee members want
> commit rights for our SVN repo?
>
> In any case, I've added it.  Please check that things are all correct
> and as you want it.  https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/changeset/12765/ and
> https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/changeset/12766/ (rename files removing
> "draft")
>
> >
> > We have to kick out the call by tomorrow.
>
> Let me know if you need anything else.  Feel free to use your own
> access as well.
>
> Thanks for putting this all together!
>
> Best regards, Eli
>
> >
> > Thanks, Till
> >
> >
> > Am 05.09.19 um 17:06 schrieb Eli Adam:
> > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 12:23 AM Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> wrote:
> > >> Jachym,
> > >>
> > >> I accepted the last small edits of Paul now, could you please load up
> > >> the RfP document [1] today and send me a message, that all is ready ;-) ?
> > > This new Gitea repo should be public and not private right?
> > >
> > > Till and others who is planning on directly making commits to the new
> > > repo?  I'm hoping that it will be at least a few people.
> > >
> > > Best regards, Eli
> > >
> > >> When you added it, could you also adapt the link to the document in [2],
> > >> I tzhink it makes sense to put the financial sheets also in the new
> > >> repo, can you also do that and alter the link?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Many thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Till
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SUA7Kt6EEtLj6ZWSensMjFnMNxCamXe4jupmKN-O-kc
> > >>
> > >> [2] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2021_Bid_Process -> chapter "RFP
> > >> Documents"
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Am 04.09.19 um 16:59 schrieb Eli Adam:
> > >>> This time resent to include the list.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:02 PM Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
> > >>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'm somewhat indifferent on platform as long as SAC is supporting it
> > >>>> or it is otherwise reliable.  I've not kept up to date on OSGeo Gitea.
> > >>>> Which projects use this as their primary repo?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 6:17 AM Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> Hi Till (and all the others),
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I suggest, we move from SVN to Gitea [1] One of the advantages is
> > >>>>> (except from - it's GIT!) is, that everybody with OSGeo UserID can
> > >>>>> acces
> > >>>> There is already a process to grant people SVN access,
> > >>>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Subversion#Add.2FRemove_Committer and I've
> > >>>> offered to give access to anyone (appropriate) who wants it.  I think
> > >>>> that Till already has rights here.  I'm also glad to make commits for
> > >>>> anyone as needed if they for some reason don't want to do it
> > >>>> themselves.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'm not really in favor of change for the sake of change but if it
> > >>>> leads to more people contributing, I'm all for that!  Who would
> > >>>> contribute if we switch to Gitea?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This url, https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/conference-commitee/foss4g, 404s
> > >>>> for me.  If we go this route, will this be a publicly accessible url
> > >>>> where anyone can track the progress?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If SAC is supporting Gitea, other OSGeo projects use it as their
> > >>>> primary repo, additional people will/might contribute, and it provides
> > >>>> a publicly accessible url, then I'm all for switching.  Thanks for
> > >>>> suggesting this Jachym.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Best regards, Eli
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> ok?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> J
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [1] https://git.osgeo.org/gitea
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> po 2. 9. 2019 v 15:14 odesílatel Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> napsal:
> > >>>>>> Hi CC,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I made a copy of last years RfP document here:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SUA7Kt6EEtLj6ZWSensMjFnMNxCamXe4jupmKN-O-kc
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> and shared it with the same people, so you should be able to edit (if
> > >>>>>> not, please ask me). As we do not have much time left (the call will go
> > >>>>>> out this friday on 6th of September) and nobody clearly stated needs to
> > >>>>>> alter this document. so I regard it more or less as finished (@Guido: I
> > >>>>>> accepted most of your comments/changes from last year). Nevertheless,
> > >>>>>> please feel free to read and make minor changes, that improve the
> > >>>>>> quality of the document or add s.th. important, that we missed before.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Can someone with SVN access upload this document as Pdf on
> > >>>>>> https://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/rfp/2021/FOSS4G2021-request-for-proposal.pdf
> > >>>>>> (as linked here: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2021_Bid_Process)
> > >>>>>> *before* this friday?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I think we do not need any changes on the budget template sheet.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> As CRO's I have agreed with Codrina and Arnulf, they will receive and
> > >>>>>> count your votes and inform me with the final results of the voting steps.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> So far & all the best, regards,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Till
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Jachym Cepicky
> > >>>>> e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com
> > >>>>> URL: http://les-ejk.cz
> > >>>>> GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Conference_dev mailing list
> > >>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Conference_dev mailing list
> > >> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev

-- 
Jachym Cepicky
e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com
URL: http://les-ejk.cz
GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp