[OSGeo-Conf] Poll: Change FOSS4G structure to have some continuity of organization and management

[Eli Adam]

Hi all (particularly voting committee members),

The current FOSS4G structure has a new LOC every year starting more or less
from scratch (some things like mailing lists and seed money are passed
on).  Over the years, many people have commented on the load of work this
creates for the LOC, the general inefficiency, the risk, and the burnout.

If you consider yourself a voting member of the committee (
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Committee#Current_Members), please
indicate your preference on this.

This is an informal poll to see if the conference committee wants to:
1. Keep it the way it is and not change anything
2. Change the FOSS4G organizing structure to something else (discussion of
what we change it to can come later if people want to pursue this).

As I've expressed several times, I prefer option 2, changing the FOSS4G
organizing structure.

Thanks for your time and participation.

Best regards, Eli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20220203/d8186f06/attachment.html>